The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A chromosome-level genome of the spider Trichonephila antipodiana reveals the genetic basis of its polyphagy and evidence of an ancient whole-genome duplication event
Open accessAbstract
Background: The spider Trichonephila antipodiana (Araneidae), commonly known as the batik golden web spider, preys on arthropods with body sizes ranging from ∼2 mm in length to insects larger than itself (>20‒50 mm), indicating its polyphagy and strong dietary detoxification abilities. Although it has been reported that an ancient whole-genome duplication event occurred in spiders, lack of a high-quality genome has limited characterization of this event. Results: We present a chromosome-level T. antipodiana genome constructed on the basis of PacBio and Hi-C sequencing. The assembled genome is 2.29 Gb in size with a scaffold N50 of 172.89 Mb. Hi-C scaffolding assigned 98.5% of the bases to 13 pseudo-chromosomes, and BUSCO completeness analysis revealed that the assembly included 94.8% of the complete arthropod universal single-copy orthologs (n = 1,066). Repetitive elements account for 59.21% of the genome. We predicted 19,001 protein-coding genes, of which 96.78% were supported by transcriptome-based evidence and 96.32% matched protein records in the UniProt database. The genome also shows substantial expansions in several detoxification-associated gene families, including cytochrome P450 mono-oxygenases, carboxyl/cholinesterases, glutathione-S-transferases, and ATP-binding cassette transporters, reflecting the possible genomic basis of polyphagy. Further analysis of the T. antipodiana genome architecture reveals an ancient whole-genome duplication event, based on 2 lines of evidence: (i) large-scale duplications from inter-chromosome synteny analysis and (ii) duplicated clusters of Hox genes. Conclusions: The high-quality T. antipodiana genome represents a valuable resource for spider research and provides insights into this species’ adaptation to the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability
Katoh, K., & Standley, D. M. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010 · Cited by 46,209
featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K., & Shi, W. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · Cited by 27,219
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., & Madden, T. L. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · Cited by 22,074
IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era
Minh, B. Q., Schmidt, H. A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M. D., von Haeseler, A., & Lanfear, R. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · Cited by 16,873
Minimap2: Pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences
Li, H. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 · Cited by 14,807
OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics
Emms, D. M., & Kelly, S. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y · Cited by 7,676
Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y., & Pevzner, P. A. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 · Cited by 5,986
The Pfam protein families database in 2019
El-Gebali, S., Mistry, J., Bateman, A., Eddy, S. R., Luciani, A., Potter, S. C., Qureshi, M., Richardson, L. J., Salazar, G. A., Smart, A., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky995 · Cited by 4,602
RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families
Flynn, J. M., Hubley, R., Goubert, C., Rosen, J., Clark, A. G., Feschotte, C., & Smit, A. F. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921046117 · Cited by 3,848
Cited by
Mammalian PIWI–piRNA–target complexes reveal features for broad and efficient target silencing
Li, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhou, L., Xu, Q., Li, L., Zeng, L., Xue, J., Niu, H., Zhong, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-024-01287-6 · Cited by 35
Self-citationRajan, S., Zaccaria, S., Cannon, M. V., Cam, M., Gross, A. C., Raphael, B. J., & Roberts, R. D. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.30.458268 · Cited by 33
Jensvold, Z. D., Flood, J. R., Christenson, A. E., & Lewis, P. W. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53761-w · Cited by 22
Rapid, Reference-Free human genotype imputation with denoising autoencoders
Dias, R., Evans, D., Chen, S.-F., Chen, K.-Y., Loguercio, S., Chan, L., & Torkamani, A. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.75600 · Cited by 16
Human Gut Metagenomes Encode Diverse GH156 Sialidases
Mann, E., Shekarriz, S., & Surette, M. G. (2022) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01755-22 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, Z., Yuan, T., Liu, P., Wang, L.-Y., Jin, J.-F., Zhang, F., & Zhang, Z.-S.
- Venue
- GigaScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2047-217X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3137236109
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 13.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.