Cited by 16Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid, Reference-Free human genotype imputation with denoising autoencoders

Open access
Dias, Raquel, Evans, Doug, Chen, Shang-Fu, Chen, Kai-Yu, Loguercio, Salvatore, Chan, Leslie, Torkamani, Ali·2022·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Genotype imputation is a foundational tool for population genetics. Standard statistical imputation approaches rely on the co-location of large whole-genome sequencing-based reference panels, powerful computing environments, and potentially sensitive genetic study data. This results in computational resource and privacy-risk barriers to access to cutting-edge imputation techniques. Moreover, the accuracy of current statistical approaches is known to degrade in regions of low and complex linkage disequilibrium. Artificial neural network-based imputation approaches may overcome these limitations by encoding complex genotype relationships in easily portable inference models. Here, we demonstrate an autoencoder-based approach for genotype imputation, using a large, commonly used reference panel, and spanning the entirety of human chromosome 22. Our autoencoder-based genotype imputation strategy achieved superior imputation accuracy across the allele-frequency spectrum and across genomes of diverse ancestry, while delivering at least fourfold faster inference run time relative to standard imputation tools.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.75600

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Abouzid, 2019, Signal speech reconstruction and noise removal using convolutional denoising audioencoders with neural deep learning, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 100, 501, 10.1007/s10470-019-01446-6 · DOI
  2. Alexander, 2009, Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals, Genome Research, 19, 1655, 10.1101/gr.094052.109 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Auton, 2015, A global reference for human genetic variation, Nature, 526, 68, 10.1038/nature15393 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Berisa, 2016, Approximately independent linkage disequilibrium blocks in human populations, Bioinformatics, 32, 283, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv546 · DOI
  5. Bild, 2002, Multi-Ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design, American Journal of Epidemiology, 156, 871, 10.1093/aje/kwf113 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Browning, 2016, Genotype imputation with millions of reference samples, American Journal of Human Genetics, 98, 116, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.020 · DOI
  7. Browning, 2018, A one-penny imputed genome from next-generation reference panels, American Journal of Human Genetics, 103, 338, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.015 · DOI
  8. Cann, 2002, A human genome diversity cell line panel, Science, 296, 261, 10.1126/science.296.5566.261b · DOI
  9. Chaitanya, 2017, Interactive reconstruction of Monte Carlo image sequences using a recurrent denoising autoencoder, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36, 1, 10.1145/3072959.3073601 · DOI
  10. Chen, 2019, Sparse convolutional denoising autoencoders for genotype imputation, Genes, 10, 10.3390/genes10090652 · DOI
  11. Danecek, 2021, Twelve years of samtools and bcftools, GigaScience, 10, 1, 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 · DOI
  12. Das, 2016, Next-Generation genotype imputation service and methods, Nature Genetics, 48, 1284, 10.1038/ng.3656 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Das, 2018, Genotype imputation from large reference panels, Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 19, 73, 10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021602 · DOI
  14. Dias, 2019, Artificial intelligence in clinical and genomic diagnostics, Genome Medicine, 11, 10.1186/s13073-019-0689-8 · DOI
  15. Dias R. 2021. Imputation_accuracy_calculator. Software Heritage. swh:1:rev:e01229e3f245e8bb95b29d4f4f1e547fcff70ae4. https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:27393c4be42545b487fe4f32cf34c200cd1e9d99;origin=https://github.com/TorkamaniLab/imputation_accuracy_calculator;visit=swh:1:snp:c520059cc24989cbe62e6e82c890d0aa1e14fcf0;anchor=swh:1:rev:e01229e3f245e8bb95b29d4f4f1e547fcff70ae4.
  16. Dias R. 2022. Imputator_inference. Software Heritage. swh:1:rev:2fbd203acf8aaf320a520c6374d6f4d57f068a7c. https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:bcdf526c7102b44428af0a8edc41c95c449c7713;origin=https://github.com/TorkamaniLab/imputator_inference;visit=swh:1:snp:1f1e9662e49b6476f0475c52ca54929ae422184d;anchor=swh:1:rev:2fbd203acf8aaf320a520c6374d6f4d57f068a7c.
  17. Dias R, Chen S, Rogers DM. 2022. Imputation_Autoencoder. Software Heritage. swh:1:rev:35d2e292e786ebc41e71f27809dad56b1e1933c4; path=/autoencoder_tuning_pipeline/. https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:20c922e4cce40c9c9f017de70cbed0dafea410ec;origin=https://github.com/TorkamaniLab/Imputation_Autoencoder;visit=swh:1:snp:7604f13a3ae5a1471b1c6620b00dd37d16a6b33f;anchor=swh:1:rev:35d2e292e786ebc41e71f27809dad56b1e1933c4;path=/autoencoder_tuning_pipeline/.
  18. Dimitromanolakis, 2019, Sim1000G: a user-friendly genetic variant simulator in R for unrelated individuals and family-based designs, BMC Bioinformatics, 20, 10.1186/s12859-019-2611-1 · DOI
  19. Erikson, 2016, Whole-Genome sequencing of a healthy aging cohort, Cell, 165, 1002, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Frazer, 2007, A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs, Nature, 449, 851, 10.1038/nature06258 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ghosh, 2020, Restoration of mammograms by using deep convolutional denoising auto-encoders, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 990, 435, 10.1007/978-981-13-8676-3_38 · DOI
  22. Islam T, Kim CH, Iwata H, Shimono H, Kimura A, Zaw H, Raghavan C, Leung H, Singh RK. 2021. A Deep Learning Method to Impute Missing Values and Compress Genome-ide Polymorphism Data in Rice In. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies.
  23. Kojima, 2020, A genotype imputation method for de-identified haplotype reference information by using recurrent neural network, PLOS Computational Biology, 16, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008207 · DOI
  24. Kowalski, 2019, Use of > 100,000 NHLBI trans-omics for precision medicine (topmed) Consortium whole genome sequences improves imputation quality and detection of rare variant associations in admixed African and Hispanic/Latino populations, PLOS Genetics, 15, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008500 · DOI
  25. Li, 2009, Genotype imputation, Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 10, 387, 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164242 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Lin TY, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollar P. 2017. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.02002. · arXiv
  27. Liu, 2020, Multilingual denoising pre-training for neural machine translation, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8, 726, 10.1162/tacl_a_00343 · DOI
  28. Mao, 2016, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29
  29. Marchini, 2010, Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies, Nature Reviews. Genetics, 11, 499, 10.1038/nrg2796 · DOI
  30. McCarthy, 2016, A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation, Nature Genetics, 48, 1279, 10.1038/ng.3643 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Mou, 2018, Lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation by race and socioeconomic status: ARIC study (atherosclerosis risk in communities), Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 11, 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006350 · DOI
  32. Naito, 2021, A deep learning method for HLA imputation and trans-ethnic MHC fine-mapping of type 1 diabetes, Nature Communications, 12, 1, 10.1038/s41467-021-21975-x · DOI
  33. Rubinacci, 2020, Genotype imputation using the positional Burrows wheeler transform, PLOS Genetics, 16, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009049 · DOI
  34. Sarkar, 2021, Fast and scalable private genotype imputation using machine learning and partially homomorphic encryption, IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 9, 93097, 10.1109/access.2021.3093005 · DOI
  35. Sun, 2008, Imputing missing genotypic data of single-nucleotide polymorphisms using neural networks, European Journal of Human Genetics, 16, 487, 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201988 · DOI
  36. Taliun, 2021, Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI topmed program, Nature, 590, 290, 10.1038/s41586-021-03205-y · DOI · Paper page
  37. Tian, 2020, Deep learning on image denoising: an overview, Neural Networks, 131, 251, 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Voulodimos, 2018, Deep learning for computer vision: a brief review, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2018, 10.1155/2018/7068349 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Xie, 2012, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 (NIPS 2012)

Metadata

Authors
Dias, R., Evans, D., Chen, S.-F., Chen, K.-Y., Loguercio, S., Chan, L., & Torkamani, A.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Scripps Research Translational Institute, Scripps Research Institute
Corresponding author
Torkamani, Ali
Venue
eLife
Published
2022-09-23
Volume
11
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296808098
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01HG010881, KL2TR002552, U24TR002306, UL1TR002550)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
genotype imputation, denoising autoencoder, artificial neural networks, linkage disequilibrium, chromosome 22, allele frequency spectrum, ancestry diversity, inference speed, genetic privacy
MeSH terms
Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review