The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the total number of phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteomes
Open accessAbstract
Background: Phosphorylation is the most frequent post-translational modification made to proteins and may regulate protein activity as either a molecular digital switch or a rheostat. Despite the cornucopia of high-throughput (HTP) phosphoproteomic data in the last decade, it remains unclear how many proteins are phosphorylated and how many phosphorylation sites (p-sites) can exist in total within a eukaryotic proteome. We present the first reliable estimates of the total number of phosphoproteins and p-sites for four eukaryotes (human, mouse, Arabidopsis, and yeast). Results: In all, 187 HTP phosphoproteomic datasets were filtered, compiled, and studied along with two low-throughput (LTP) compendia. Estimates of the number of phosphoproteins and p-sites were inferred by two methods: Capture-Recapture, and fitting the saturation curve of cumulative redundant vs. cumulative non-redundant phosphoproteins/p-sites. Estimates were also adjusted for different levels of noise within the individual datasets and other confounding factors. We estimate that in total, 13 000, 11 000, and 3000 phosphoproteins and 230 000, 156 000, and 40 000 p-sites exist in human, mouse, and yeast, respectively, whereas estimates for Arabidopsis were not as reliable. Conclusions: Most of the phosphoproteins have been discovered for human, mouse, and yeast, while the dataset for Arabidopsis is still far from complete. The datasets for p-sites are not as close to saturation as those for phosphoproteins. Integration of the LTP data suggests that current HTP phosphoproteomics appears to be capable of capturing 70 % to 95 % of total phosphoproteins, but only 40 % to 60 % of total p-sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Goffeau, A., Barrell, B. G., Bussey, H., Davis, R. W., Dujon, B., Feldmann, H., Galibert, F., Hoheisel, J. D., Jacq, C., Johnston, M., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5287.546 · Cited by 4,263
Self-citationGlobal analysis of protein expression in yeast
Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W.-K., Bower, K., Howson, R. W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'Shea, E. K., & Weissman, J. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02046 · Cited by 3,750
PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations
Hornbeck, P. V., Zhang, B., Murray, B., Kornhauser, J. M., Latham, V., & Skrzypek, E. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1267 · Cited by 3,411
The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools
Lamesch, P., Berardini, T. Z., Li, D., Swarbreck, D., Wilks, C., Sasidharan, R., Muller, R., Dreher, K., Alexander, D. L., Garcia-Hernandez, M., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1090 · Cited by 2,399
Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation
Ubersax, J. A., & Ferrell Jr, J. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2203 · Cited by 1,451
The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation
Iakoucheva, L. M. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh253 · Cited by 1,429
TimeTree: A public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms
Hedges, S. B., Dudley, J., & Kumar, S. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl505 · Cited by 1,234
The origins of protein phosphorylation
Cohen, P. (2002) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb0502-e127 · Cited by 1,139
The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation – a 25 year update
Cohen, P. (2000) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01712-6 · Cited by 1,136
Cited by
Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species
Rhie, A., McCarthy, S. A., Fedrigo, O., Damas, J., Formenti, G., Koren, S., Uliano-Silva, M., Chow, W., Fungtammasan, A., Kim, J., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03451-0 · Cited by 3,097
Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species
Rhie, A., McCarthy, S. A., Fedrigo, O., Damas, J., Formenti, G., Koren, S., Uliano-Silva, M., Chow, W., Fungtammasan, A., Gedman, G. L., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.22.110833 · Cited by 3,097
GenomeScope 2.0 and Smudgeplot for reference-free profiling of polyploid genomes
Ranallo-Benavidez, T. R., Jaron, K. S., & Schatz, M. C. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14998-3 · Cited by 2,759
Nanopore sequencing and assembly of a human genome with ultra-long reads
Jain, M., Koren, S., Miga, K. H., Quick, J., Rand, A. C., Sasani, T. A., Tyson, J. R., Beggs, A. D., Dilthey, A. T., Fiddes, I. T., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4060 · Cited by 1,892
Kieft, K., Zhou, Z., & Anantharaman, K. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00867-0 · Cited by 1,123
Metadata
- Authors
- Vlastaridis, P., Kyriakidou, P., Chaliotis, A., Van de Peer, Y., Oliver, S. G., & Amoutzias, G. D.
- Venue
- GigaScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-01-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 2047-217X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2605025138
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 43.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the total number of phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gigascience/giw015
- The paper
- Vlastaridis, P., Kyriakidou, P., Chaliotis, A., Van de Peer, Y., Oliver, S. G., & Amoutzias, G. D. (2017). Estimating the total number of phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteomes. GigaScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giw015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
