The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EEG dataset and OpenBMI toolbox for three BCI paradigms: an investigation into BCI illiteracy
Open accessAbstract
Background: Electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) systems are mainly divided into three major paradigms: motor imagery (MI), event-related potential (ERP), and steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP). Here, we present a BCI dataset that includes the three major BCI paradigms with a large number of subjects over multiple sessions. In addition, information about the psychological and physiological conditions of BCI users was obtained using a questionnaire, and task-unrelated parameters such as resting state, artifacts, and electromyography of both arms were also recorded. We evaluated the decoding accuracies for the individual paradigms and determined performance variations across both subjects and sessions. Furthermore, we looked for more general, severe cases of BCI illiteracy than have been previously reported in the literature. Results: Average decoding accuracies across all subjects and sessions were 71.1% (± 0.15), 96.7% (± 0.05), and 95.1% (± 0.09), and rates of BCI illiteracy were 53.7%, 11.1%, and 10.2% for MI, ERP, and SSVEP, respectively. Compared to the ERP and SSVEP paradigms, the MI paradigm exhibited large performance variations between both subjects and sessions. Furthermore, we found that 27.8% (15 out of 54) of users were universally BCI literate, i.e., they were able to proficiently perform all three paradigms. Interestingly, we found no universally illiterate BCI user, i.e., all participants were able to control at least one type of BCI system. Conclusions: Our EEG dataset can be utilized for a wide range of BCI-related research questions. All methods for the data analysis in this study are supported with fully open-source scripts that can aid in every step of BCI technology. Furthermore, our results support previous but disjointed findings on the phenomenon of BCI illiteracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143
Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication
Pfurtscheller, G., & Neuper, C. (2001) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.939829 · Cited by 1,990
High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain–computer interface
Chen, X., Wang, Y., Nakanishi, M., Gao, X., Jung, T.-P., & Gao, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1508080112 · Cited by 969
Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance
Blankertz, B., Sannelli, C., Halder, S., Hammer, E. M., Kübler, A., Müller, K.-R., Curio, G., & Dickhaus, T. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.022 · Cited by 674
Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG
Sakkalis, V. (2011) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.020 · Cited by 637
Towards a cure for BCI illiteracy
Vidaurre, C., & Blankertz, B. (2010) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0121-6 · Cited by 501
BCI demographics: how many (and what kinds of) people can use an SSVEP BCI?
Allison, B., Luth, T., Valbuena, D., Teymourian, A., Volosyak, I., & Graser, A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2009.2039495 · Cited by 344
Cited by
Brain-Controlled Robotic Arm System Based on Multi-Directional CNN-BiLSTM Network Using EEG Signals
Jeong, J.-H., Shim, K.-H., Kim, D.-J., & Lee, S.-W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2020.2981659 · Cited by 292
Self-citationEEG-ITNet: An Explainable Inception Temporal Convolutional Network for Motor Imagery Classification
Salami, A., Andreu-Perez, J., & Gillmeister, H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3161489 · Cited by 155
EEG Dataset for RSVP and P300 Speller Brain-Computer Interfaces
Won, K., Kwon, M., Ahn, M., & Jun, S. C. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01509-w · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, M.-H., Kwon, O.-Y., Kim, Y.-J., Kim, H.-K., Lee, Y.-E., Williamson, J., Fazli, S., & Lee, S.-W.
- Venue
- GigaScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-01-30
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2047-217X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912885887
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 22.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EEG dataset and OpenBMI toolbox for three BCI paradigms: an investigation into BCI illiteracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gigascience/giz002
- The paper
- Lee, M.-H., Kwon, O.-Y., Kim, Y.-J., Kim, H.-K., Lee, Y.-E., Williamson, J., Fazli, S., & Lee, S.-W. (2019). EEG dataset and OpenBMI toolbox for three BCI paradigms: an investigation into BCI illiteracy. GigaScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.