The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations.
Open accessAbstract
In a recent article published in this journal, Lombard, Snyder-Duch, and Bracken (2002) surveyed 200 content analyses for their reporting of reliability tests; compared the virtues and drawbacks of five popular reliability measures; and proposed guidelines and standards for their use. Their discussion revealed that numerous misconceptions circulate in the content analysis literature regarding how these measures behave and can aid or deceive content analysts in their effort to ensure the reliability of their data. This paper proposes three conditions for statistical measures to serve as indices of the reliability of data and examines the mathematical structure and the behavior of the five coefficients discussed by the authors, plus two others. It compares common beliefs about these coefficients with what they actually do and concludes with alternative recommendations for testing reliability in content analysis and similar data-making efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For the 6 moderator variables, Krippendorff’s alpha ranged from 0.81 to 0.99, and therefore above the acceptable level (Krippendorff, 2004).”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Krippendorff, 2004
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Krippendorff's (2004) criterion of significance is therefore satisfied here too.”
From Weighted Krippendorff's alpha is a more reliable metrics for multi-coders ordinal annotations: experimental studies on emotion, opinion and coreference annotation (2014) · cites this paper as Krippendorff's (2004)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Krippendorff's α α α α (Krippendorff, 2004) considers chance independently from coders like Scott's π, but data reliability is estimated depending on disagreement instead of agreement:”
From Weighted Krippendorff's alpha is a more reliable metrics for multi-coders ordinal annotations: experimental studies on emotion, opinion and coreference annotation (2014) · cites this paper as Krippendorff, 2004
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The criterion of data significance -at least five chance agreements per category -proposed by (Krippendorff, 2004) is greatly satisfied for the valence annotation (3 categories).”
From Weighted Krippendorff's alpha is a more reliable metrics for multi-coders ordinal annotations: experimental studies on emotion, opinion and coreference annotation (2014) · cites this paper as Krippendorff, 2004
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Bennett, E. M., Alpert, R., & Goldstein, A. C. (1954). Communications through limited response questioning. Public Opinion Quarterly, 18, 303-308.
- Craig, R. T. (1981). Generalization of Scott"s index of intercoder agreement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 260-264.
- Goodman, L. A, & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732-764.
- Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
- Hughes, M. A., & Garrett, D. E. (1990). Intercoder reliability estimation -Approaches in marketing: A generalizability theory framework for quantitative data. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 185- 195.
- Krippendorff, K. (1970). Bivariate agreement coefficients for reliability data. In E. R. Borgatta & G. W. Bohrnstedt (Eds.), Sociological methodology 1970 (pp. 139-150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Maxwell, A. E. (1970). Comparing the classification of subjects by two independent judges. British Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 651-655.
- Osgood, C. E. (1959). The representational model and relevant research. In I. de Sola Pool (Ed.), Trends in content analysis (pp. 33-88). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258-284.
- Riffe, D., & Freitag, A. (1996, August). Twenty-five years of content analyses in Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Paper presented to the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA, cited in D. Riffe, S. Lacy, & F. G. Fico (1998). Analyzing media messages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
- Zwick, R. (1988). Another look at interrater agreement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 347-387.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,010
Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2020) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scaa003 · Cited by 20
Are there non-verbal signals of guilt?
Julle-Danière, É., Whitehouse, J., Mielke, A., Vrij, A., Gustafsson, E., Micheletta, J., & Waller, B. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231756 · Cited by 22
Turner, M. M., Ford, L., Somerville, V., Javellana, D., Day, K. R., & Lapinski, M. K. (2020) · Communication Reports · doi:10.1080/08934215.2020.1793375 · Cited by 21
Smart Analysis of Economics Sentiment in Spanish Based on Linguistic Features and Transformers
García-Díaz, J. A., García‐Sánchez, F., & Valencia‐García, R. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3244065 · Cited by 21
Female Forces: Beauty, Brains, and a Badge
Rabe-Hemp, C. E. (2011) · Feminist Criminology · doi:10.1177/1557085111398471 · Cited by 20
Culture and innovation in SMEs: the intellectual structure of research for further inquiry
González‐Loureiro, M., Sousa, M. J., & Pinto, H. (2017) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1290052 · Cited by 20
Rees, G. H., Crampton, P., Gauld, R. D. C., & MacDonell, S. G. (2018) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.009 · Cited by 21
Extending the Privacy Calculus: The Role of Psychological Ownership
Cichy, P., Salge, T. O., & Kohli, R. (2014) · ARBOR - Bern University of Applied Sciences Repository · doi:10.24451/arbor.16074 · Cited by 20
Detecting Topic-Oriented Speaker Stance in Conversational Speech
Lai, C., Alex, B., Moore, J. D., Tian, L., Hori, T., & Francesca, G. (2019) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-2632 · Cited by 19
Reliability assessment for remote sensing data: Beyond Cohen's kappa
Kerr, G., Fischer, C., & Reulke, R. (2015) · IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) · doi:10.1109/igarss.2015.7326954 · Cited by 19
Evaluating Human versus Machine Learning Performance in a LegalTech Problem
Orosz, T., Vági, R., Csányi, G. M., Nagy, D., Üveges, I., Vadász, J. P., & Megyeri, A. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12010297 · Cited by 21
Kusumowidagdo, A., Ujang, N. B., Rahadiyanti, M., & Ramli, N. A. (2022) · Open House International · doi:10.1108/ohi-01-2022-0009 · Cited by 19
Culinary capital of Michelin restaurants consumers: A netnographic analysis
Lee, H.-J., & Ko, J. (2022) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.04.011 · Cited by 19
Applications of educational data mining and learning analytics on data from cybersecurity training
Švábenský, V., Vykopal, J., Čeleda, P., & Kraus, L. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11093-6 · Cited by 19
Sharma, D., & Meena, R. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2022.2098518 · Cited by 19
Fink, A., Young, J. D., Vuppala, N. K., & Frey, R. F. (2022) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d2rp00166g · Cited by 24
Amoako, K. O., Marfo, E. O., Akwaa‐Sekyi, E. K., Amaning, N., & Yankey, N. (2022) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-02-2022-0104 · Cited by 19
Requirements Classification for Traceability Link Recovery
Hey, T., Keim, J., & Corallo, S. (2024) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re59067.2024.00024 · Cited by 19
Understanding the Information Needs of Large-Scale Digital Library Users
Zavalina, O. L., & Vassilieva, E. V. (2014) · Library Resources and Technical Services · doi:10.5860/lrts.58n2.84 · Cited by 19
Automated Indicators to Assess the Creativity of Solutions to Programming Exercises
Manske, S., & Hoppe, H. U. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2014.147 · Cited by 19
Evaluating students' learning gains and experiences from using nomenclature101.com
Bodé, N. E., Caron, J., & Flynn, A. B. (2016) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c6rp00132g · Cited by 19
O’Brien, K. M., & Daffern, M. (2016) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2016.1230923 · Cited by 19
Lundberg, K., Jong, M., Kristiansen, L. P., & Jong, M. (2016) · EXPLORE · doi:10.1016/j.explore.2016.12.001 · Cited by 19
Unsupervised Discovery of Character Dictionaries in Animation Movies
Somandepalli, K., Kumar, N., Guha, T., & Narayanan, S. S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2017.2745712 · Cited by 19
Hays, A., & Butauski, M. (2017) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2017.1398834 · Cited by 19
Mazza, B. P. (2018) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-018-0638-2 · Cited by 19
Riles, J. M., Varava, K. A., Pilny, A. N., & Tewksbury, D. H. (2018) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2018.1451862 · Cited by 19
The Mitcham Score: quantifying students’ descriptions of technology
Svenningsson, J. (2019) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09530-8 · Cited by 16
Szteinberg, G., Repice, M. D., Hendrick, C., Meyerink, S., & Frey, R. F. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-05-0091 · Cited by 19
Hassles of cabin crew: An exploratory study
Tsaur, S., Hsu, F.-S., & Kung, L.-H. (2020) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101812 · Cited by 19
Liebst, L. S., Philpot, R., Levine, M., & Lindegaard, M. R. (2020) · Psychology of Violence · doi:10.1037/vio0000299 · Cited by 21
Air superiority and battlefield victory
Saunders, R., & Souva, M. (2020) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168020972816 · Cited by 19
Geiß, S. (2021) · Computational Communication Research · doi:10.5117/ccr2021.1.003.geis · Cited by 19
Disruption and Legitimacy: Big Data in Society
Ferreira, C., Merendino, A., & Meadows, M. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10155-3 · Cited by 19
Schläppy, M., Robinson, L. M., Camilieri‐Asch, V., & Miller, K. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.642539 · Cited by 19
Rohrer, P. L., Florit‐Pons, J., Vilà‐Giménez, I., & Prieto, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661339 · Cited by 25
Barriers to Formal IT Governance Practice -- Insights from a Qualitative Study
Othman, M. F. I., & Chan, T. (2013) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2013.112 · Cited by 19
Better than Their Reputation? On the Reliability of Relevance Assessments with Students
Schaer, P. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33247-0_14 · Cited by 19
Narrative Performance of Gifted African American School-Aged Children From Low-Income Backgrounds
Mills, M. T. (2014) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2014_ajslp-13-0150 · Cited by 19
Banerjee, S. C., Greene, K. L., Hecht, M. L., Magsamen‐Conrad, K., & Elek, E. (2013) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.762826 · Cited by 19
Bourque, C. J., & Bourdon, S. (2016) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2015.1135882 · Cited by 27
Gaither, B. M., & Austin, L. (2016) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.001 · Cited by 19
The UK Stewardship Code and investee earnings quality
Lu, C., Christensen, J., Hollindale, J., & Routledge, J. (2018) · Accounting Research Journal · doi:10.1108/arj-09-2016-0116 · Cited by 19
Lauzen, M. M., Dozier, D. M., & Cleveland, E. (2006) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9100-5 · Cited by 19
The cultural identity of first-generation adult immigrants: A meta-analysis
Maehler, D. B., & Daikeler, J. (2024) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2024.2399559 · Cited by 23
Babalou, Y., Maleki, A., & Gibson, H. (2025) · Journal of Vacation Marketing · doi:10.1177/13567667241306428 · Cited by 18
Rosa, D., MacDermid, J. C., & Klubowicz, D. (2021) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-021-01774-0 · Cited by 18
Lee, J., Kaat, A. J., & Roberts, M. Y. (2022) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2022_ajslp-21-00246 · Cited by 18
Addressing religious hate online: from taxonomy creation to automated detection
Ramponi, A., Testa, B., Tonelli, S., & Ježek, E. (2022) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1128 · Cited by 21
Loukachevitch, N., Artemova, E., Batura, T. V., Braslavski, P., Ivanov, V. V., Manandhar, S., Pugachev, A., Рожков, І. М., Shelmanov, A., Tutubalina, E. V., et al. (2023) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-023-09674-z · Cited by 19
Anđić, B., Maričić, M., Weinhandl, R., Mumcu, F., Schmidthaler, E., & Lavicza, Z. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12408-x · Cited by 18
Virtual reality roleplays for patients with depression: A user experience evaluation
Holsteg, S., Askeridis, J. M., Krajewski, J., Mildner, P., Freitag, S., Müller, T., Schnieder, S., Gieselmann, A., & Karger, A. (2024) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2024.100713 · Cited by 19
Resilient business strategies in the German hospitality industry and its viability
Ruppenthal, T., & Rückert‐John, J. (2024) · Tourism & Management Studies · doi:10.18089/tms.20240301 · Cited by 18
Clementson, D. E. (2015) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x15600732 · Cited by 22
Yell, P. C., Burns, D. K., Dittmar, E., White, C. L., & Cai, C. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-018-0512-6 · Cited by 18
Digging for (Ratings) Gold: The Connection Between Investigative Journalism and Audiences
Abdenour, J., & Riffe, D. (2019) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2019.1598887 · Cited by 18
Yang, E., & Faust, K. M. (2019) · Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001126 · Cited by 19
Compliance Cautions: Investigating Security Issues Associated with U.S. Digital-Security Standards
Stevens, R., Dykstra, J., Everette, W. K., Chapman, J., Bladow, G., Farmer, A., Halliday, K., & Mazurek, M. L. (2020) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2020.24003 · Cited by 18
Maehler, D. B., Daikeler, J., Ramos, H., Husson, C., & Nguyen, T. A. (2020) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2020.1765857 · Cited by 18
Zahra, J., Paramasivan, S., Blencowe, N., Cousins, S., AVERY, K. N. L., Mathews, J. A., Main, B., McNair, A., Hinchliffe, R. J., Blazeby, J. M., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035251 · Cited by 18
Harmer, E., & Southern, R. (2020) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2020.1831397 · Cited by 18
Siegwart, L. C., Böcker, A., Diehm, Y. F., Kotsougiani, D., Erdmann, S., Ziegler, B., Kneser, U., Hirche, C. R., & Fischer, S. (2020) · Journal of Burn Care & Research · doi:10.1093/jbcr/iraa218 · Cited by 19
Beck, C., Booth, H., El‐Assady, M., & Butt, M. (2020) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 18
Nienaber, A., Spundflasch, S., Soares, A. E., & Woodcock, A. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1860547 · Cited by 18
Kusters, I. S., Dean, J. M., Gutierrez, A. M., Sommer, M., & Klyueva, A. (2021) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.2017109 · Cited by 18
Swiss Job Market Monitor: A Rich Source of Demand-Side Micro Data of the Labour Market
Buchmann, M. C., Buchs, H., Busch, F., Clematide, S., Gnehm, A.-S., & Müller, J. (2022) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcac002 · Cited by 18
Thanks for joining our life: Intimacy as performativity on YouTube parenting vlogs
Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., Moreno, P. D. C., & Jaramillo-Dent, D. (2022) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2022.jul.07 · Cited by 18
Lehmann, J., Weber, F., Waldkirch, M., Graf‐Vlachy, L., & Konig, A. S. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122002 · Cited by 20
Konieczna, M., Mattis, K., Tsai, J.-Y., Liang, X., & Dunwoody, S. (2014) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.909509 · Cited by 18
Eliciting positive user experiences with self-service kiosks: pursuing possibilities
Günay, A., & Erbuğ, Ç. (2014) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2014.937459 · Cited by 18
On the Problem of Theoretical Terms in Empirical Computational Linguistics
Riezler, S. (2013) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00182 · Cited by 18
Persuading to Pay: Exploring the What and Why in Crowdfunded Journalism
Ladson, N., & Lee, A. M. (2017) · The International Journal on Media Management · doi:10.1080/14241277.2017.1298110 · Cited by 18
Wu, S., Huang, S., Wei, Y., Duffield, C. F., Tang, W., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, H. (2017) · Water Science & Technology Water Supply · doi:10.2166/ws.2017.088 · Cited by 18
Grading Prenatal Hydronephrosis from Ultrasound Imaging Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Dhindsa, K., Smail, L. C., McGrath, M., Braga, L. H., Becker, S., & Sonnadara, R. (2018) · Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision · doi:10.1109/crv.2018.00021 · Cited by 18
Manca, S., & Delfino, M. M. (2007) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587910701305293 · Cited by 18
Keliikoa, L. B., Thompson, M. D., Johnson, C. J., Cacal, S. L., Pirkle, C. M., & Sentell, T. L. (2022) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2021.100525 · Cited by 17
Snyder, M. N., & Mares, M.-L. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105034 · Cited by 17
Schmitt‐Beck, R., Roßteutscher, S., Schoen, H., Weßels, B., & Wolf, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198847519.003.0015 · Cited by 17
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2025) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100685 · Cited by 21
Federated Entity Search Using On-the-Fly Consolidation
Herzig, D. M., Mika, P., Blanco, R., & Tran, T. P. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41335-3_11 · Cited by 17
Hunter, P. V., Delbaere, M., O’Connell, M. E., Cammer, A. L., Seaton, J., Friedrich, T. E., & Fick, F. (2017) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-017-0515-3 · Cited by 17
Crown, C. A., & Doubleday, K. F. (2017) · Conservation and Society · doi:10.4103/cs.cs_15_92 · Cited by 17
Shensa, A. S., Sidani, J. E., Hoffman, B. L., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Melcher, E. M., Primack, B. A., Myers, S. P., & Burke, J. G. (2020) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-020-00175-2 · Cited by 17
Guo, S., & Xu, Q. (2021) · Communication & Sport · doi:10.1177/21674795211044188 · Cited by 17
The effects of a game-enhanced learning intervention on foreign language learning
Aydın, S. M., & Çakır, N. A. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10141-9 · Cited by 17
Elliott, D., Ochieng, C., Zahra, J., McNair, A., Main, B., Skilton, A., Blencowe, N., Cousins, S., Paramasivan, S., Hoffmann, C., et al. (2022) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000005714 · Cited by 17
Meinsma, A. L., Kristensen, S. W., Reijnierse, W. G., Smeets, I., & Cramer, J. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acc968 · Cited by 27
Moore, K. E., Wyatt, J. P., Phillips, S. M., Burke, C., Bellamy, C. D., & McKee, S. A. (2023) · Health & Justice · doi:10.1186/s40352-023-00225-w · Cited by 21
Fast fashion consumer engagement on Instagram: a case study
Bonilla-Quijada, M., Arriaga, J. L. D. O., Domingo, D. A., & Alcón, J. R. I. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2322111 · Cited by 17
The use of Islamic hedging instruments as non-speculative risk management tools
Mohamad, S., Othman, J. B., Roslin, R. M., & Lehner, O. M. (2014) · Venture Capital · doi:10.1080/13691066.2014.922824 · Cited by 17
Sela‐Shayovitz, R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-014-9213-8 · Cited by 17
Stephens, J. P., & Lyddy, C. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00362 · Cited by 18
A citizen science approach to monitoring bleaching in the zoantharian Palythoa tuberculosa
Parkinson, J. E., Yang, S., Kawamura, I., Byron, G., Todd, P. A., & Reimer, J. D. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1815 · Cited by 17
Talking it through: communication sequences in negotiation
Adair, W. L., & Loewenstein, J. (2013) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781781005903.00022 · Cited by 17
Improving relevance in a content pipeline via syntactic generalization
Galitsky, B. A. (2016) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2016.11.001 · Cited by 17
Zarza, S., & Tan, H. (2016) · Discourse & Communication · doi:10.1177/1750481316674754 · Cited by 17
The Representation of Altruistic and Egoistic Motivations in Popular Music over 60 Years
Hahn, L., Tamborini, R., Klebig, B., Novotny, E. R., Grall, C., Höfer, M., & Lee, H. (2018) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2018.1447493 · Cited by 17
Reconceptualizing TQM in service ecosystems: an integrated framework
Polese, F., Vesci, M., Troisi, O., & Grimaldi, M. (2018) · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · doi:10.1108/ijqss-10-2017-0087 · Cited by 18
Portrayals of Vaccination in Entertainment Television: A Content Analysis
McClaran, N., & Rhodes, N. D. (2020) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1749356 · Cited by 17
Detecting behavioural change in conversation: procedures and preliminary data
Azios, J. H., Archer, B., & Lee, J. B. (2020) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2020.1812031 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Krippendorff, K.
- Corresponding author
- Krippendorff, K.
- ORCID
- Krippendorff, K.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-433
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W4243989635
- Cited by
- 1,027
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- repository.upenn.edu
- Locations
- Human Communication Research (publishedVersion)
- ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- inter-rater reliability, reliability coefficients, interobserver agreement, reporting reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review