The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations.
Open accessAbstract
In a recent article published in this journal, Lombard, Snyder-Duch, and Bracken (2002) surveyed 200 content analyses for their reporting of reliability tests; compared the virtues and drawbacks of five popular reliability measures; and proposed guidelines and standards for their use. Their discussion revealed that numerous misconceptions circulate in the content analysis literature regarding how these measures behave and can aid or deceive content analysts in their effort to ensure the reliability of their data. This paper proposes three conditions for statistical measures to serve as indices of the reliability of data and examines the mathematical structure and the behavior of the five coefficients discussed by the authors, plus two others. It compares common beliefs about these coefficients with what they actually do and concludes with alternative recommendations for testing reliability in content analysis and similar data-making efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For the 6 moderator variables, Krippendorff’s alpha ranged from 0.81 to 0.99, and therefore above the acceptable level (Krippendorff, 2004).”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Krippendorff, 2004
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Krippendorff's α α α α (Krippendorff, 2004) considers chance independently from coders like Scott's π, but data reliability is estimated depending on disagreement instead of agreement:”
From Weighted Krippendorff's alpha is a more reliable metrics for multi-coders ordinal annotations: experimental studies on emotion, opinion and coreference annotation (2014) · cites this paper as Krippendorff, 2004
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The criterion of data significance -at least five chance agreements per category -proposed by (Krippendorff, 2004) is greatly satisfied for the valence annotation (3 categories).”
From Weighted Krippendorff's alpha is a more reliable metrics for multi-coders ordinal annotations: experimental studies on emotion, opinion and coreference annotation (2014) · cites this paper as Krippendorff, 2004
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Krippendorff's (2004) criterion of significance is therefore satisfied here too.”
From Weighted Krippendorff's alpha is a more reliable metrics for multi-coders ordinal annotations: experimental studies on emotion, opinion and coreference annotation (2014) · cites this paper as Krippendorff's (2004)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Bennett, E. M., Alpert, R., & Goldstein, A. C. (1954). Communications through limited response questioning. Public Opinion Quarterly, 18, 303-308.
- Craig, R. T. (1981). Generalization of Scott"s index of intercoder agreement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 260-264.
- Goodman, L. A, & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732-764.
- Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
- Hughes, M. A., & Garrett, D. E. (1990). Intercoder reliability estimation -Approaches in marketing: A generalizability theory framework for quantitative data. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 185- 195.
- Krippendorff, K. (1970). Bivariate agreement coefficients for reliability data. In E. R. Borgatta & G. W. Bohrnstedt (Eds.), Sociological methodology 1970 (pp. 139-150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Maxwell, A. E. (1970). Comparing the classification of subjects by two independent judges. British Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 651-655.
- Osgood, C. E. (1959). The representational model and relevant research. In I. de Sola Pool (Ed.), Trends in content analysis (pp. 33-88). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258-284.
- Riffe, D., & Freitag, A. (1996, August). Twenty-five years of content analyses in Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Paper presented to the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA, cited in D. Riffe, S. Lacy, & F. G. Fico (1998). Analyzing media messages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
- Zwick, R. (1988). Another look at interrater agreement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 347-387.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,010
Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach
Ciasullo, M. V., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M., & Leone, D. (2020) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00641-6 · Cited by 170
Blockchain technology and gender equality: A systematic literature review
Vaio, A. D., Hassan, R., & Palladino, R. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102517 · Cited by 159
A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals
Gomes, E., Barnes, B. R., & Mahmood, T. (2014) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.005 · Cited by 152
Depictions of Gender on Primetime Television: A Quantitative Content Analysis
Sink, A., & Mastro, D. E. (2016) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1212243 · Cited by 152
User engagement for mobile payment service providers – introducing the social media engagement model
Grover, P., & Kar, A. K. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.12.002 · Cited by 150
Inter-Coder Agreement in Qualitative Coding: Considerations for its Use
Halpin, S. N. (2024) · American Journal of Qualitative Research · doi:10.29333/ajqr/14887 · Cited by 149
Online versus in-person interviews with adolescents: An exploration of data equivalence
Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., Khan, S., & Yang, L. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.016 · Cited by 147
Social Media Messages in an Emerging Health Crisis: Tweeting Bird Flu
Vos, S. C., & Buckner, M. M. (2015) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1064495 · Cited by 155
An Emerging ‘European’ News Portrayal of Immigration?
Caviedes, A. (2015) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2014.1002199 · Cited by 146
Software Startups - A Research Agenda
Unterkalmsteiner, M., Abrahamsson, P., Wang, X., Nguyen‐Duc, A., Shah, S. M. A., Bajwa, S. S., Baltes, G. H., Conboy, K., Cullina, E., Dennehy, D., et al. (2016) · Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) · doi:10.5277/e-inf160105 · Cited by 146
Hackers vs. Testers: A Comparison of Software Vulnerability Discovery Processes
Votipka, D., Stevens, R., Redmiles, E. M., Hu, J., & Mazurek, M. L. (2018) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp.2018.00003 · Cited by 146
Conrad, K. M., Dixon, T. L., & Zhang, Y. (2009) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838150802643795 · Cited by 145
Zhang, Y., & Cole, S. T. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.001 · Cited by 142
Vandor, P., & Franke, N. (2016) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.03.003 · Cited by 152
“Think globally, act locally”: A glocal approach to the development of social media literacy
Manca, S., Bocconi, S., & Gleason, B. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104025 · Cited by 142
Gielnik, M. M., Barabas, S., Fresé, M., Namatovu-Dawa, R., Scholz, F. A., Metzger, J. R., & Walter, T. J. (2013) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.09.002 · Cited by 150
Southern, R., & Harmer, E. (2019) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439319865519 · Cited by 140
Vaio, A. D., Syriopoulos, T. C., Alvino, F., & Palladino, R. (2020) · Meditari Accountancy Research · doi:10.1108/medar-12-2019-0641 · Cited by 140
Multichannel integration quality: A systematic review and agenda for future research
Hossain, T. M. T., Akter, S., Kattiyapornpong, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.019 · Cited by 154
Grégoire, D. A., Binder, J. K., & Rauch, A. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.10.002 · Cited by 149
How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus
Krebs, R. R. (2015) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818315000181 · Cited by 137
INSPIRED: Toward Sociable Recommendation Dialog Systems
Hayati, S. A., Kang, D., Zhu, Q., Shi, W., & Yu, Z. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.654 · Cited by 159
Kammerlander, N. H., Konig, A. S., & Richards, M. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12345 · Cited by 136
Exploring big data-driven innovation in the manufacturing sector: evidence from UK firms
Babu, M. M., Rahman, M., Alam, A., & Dey, B. L. (2021) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04077-1 · Cited by 150
Langan, R. J., Cowley, S., & Nguyen, C. A. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/0273475318823849 · Cited by 135
Wind(ow) of Change: A Systematic Review of Policy Entrepreneurship Characteristics and Strategies
Aviram, N. F., Cohen, N., & Beeri, I. (2019) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12339 · Cited by 135
Building dynamic service analytics capabilities for the digital marketplace
Akter, S., Motamarri, S., Hani, U., Shams, S. M. R., Fernando, M., Babu, M. M., & Shen, K. N. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.016 · Cited by 136
Carungu, J., Pietra, R. D., & Molinari, M. (2020) · Meditari Accountancy Research · doi:10.1108/medar-08-2019-0540 · Cited by 132
Bonesso, S., Gerli, F., & Scapolan, A. (2013) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.07.003 · Cited by 141
Fink, A., Cahill, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., Hoffman, A., & Frey, R. F. (2018) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c7rp00244k · Cited by 138
Recipes for Safety in Open-domain ChatbotsPreprint
Xu, J., Ju, D., Li, M., Boureau, Y.-L., Weston, J., & Dinan, E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07079 · Cited by 236
Hut-Mossel, L., Ahaus, K., Welker, G. A., & Gans, R. O. B. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248677 · Cited by 142
Thompson, A. R., & O’Loughlin, V. D. (2014) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1507 · Cited by 135
The antecedents of boredom in L2 classroom learning
Nakamura, S., Darasawang, P., & Reinders, H. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102469 · Cited by 135
Hahn, R., & Gold, S. (2013) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.002 · Cited by 126
Liu, S., Guo, C., Al-Turjman, F. M., Muhammad, K., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C. (2020) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106537 · Cited by 125
Ouyang, F., Xu, W., & Cukurova, M. (2023) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-023-09387-z · Cited by 124
Pitelis, C. N., Teece, D. J., & Yang, H. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13021 · Cited by 124
So, J., Prestin, A., Lee, L., Wang, Y., Yen, J., & Chou, W.-Y. S. (2016) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.940675 · Cited by 123
Song, H., Tolochko, P., Eberl, J.-M., Eisele, O., Greussing, E., Heidenreich, T., Lind, F., Galyga, S., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1723752 · Cited by 123
Policy implementation lessons from six road pricing cases
Noordegraaf, D. V., Annema, J. A., & van Wee, B. (2013) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.11.003 · Cited by 123
What's congress doing on twitter?
Hemphill, L., Otterbacher, J., & Shapiro, M. A. (2013) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441876 · Cited by 123
Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population
Perko, T. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Radioactivity · doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.04.005 · Cited by 123
Philpot, R., Liebst, L. S., Levine, M., Bernasco, W., & Lindegaard, M. R. (2019) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000469 · Cited by 137
Mistakes and How to Avoid Mistakes in Using Intercoder Reliability Indices
Feng, G. C. (2014) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000086 · Cited by 132
Meme Templates as Expressive Repertoires in a Globalizing World: A Cross-Linguistic Study
Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2018) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmy016 · Cited by 120
Zaman, R., Farooq, M. B., Khalid, F., & Mahmood, Z. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2777 · Cited by 120
Luke, D. A., Caburnay, C. A., & Cohen, E. L. (2011) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2010.547823 · Cited by 119
Long, M., Steinke, J., Applegate, B. E., Lapinski, M. K., Johnson, M. J., & Ghosh, S. (2010) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547009357779 · Cited by 119
Miller, C. H., Ivanov, B., Sims, J. D., Compton, J., Harrison, K. J., Parker, K. A., Parker, J. L., & Averbeck, J. M. (2012) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01438.x · Cited by 132
TikTok and the new language of political communication
Cervi, L., Tejedor, S., & Marín, C. (2021) · Cultura Lenguaje y Representación · doi:10.6035/clr.5817 · Cited by 118
Intercoder reliability indices: disuse, misuse, and abuse
Feng, G. C. (2013) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9956-8 · Cited by 126
McKay, F. H., Slykerman, S., & Dunn, M. (2018) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/11130 · Cited by 117
Segev, E., Nissenbaum, A., Stolero, N., & Shifman, L. (2015) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12120 · Cited by 127
Semantic similarity metrics for evaluating source code summarization
Haque, S., Eberhart, Z., Bansal, A., & McMillan, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Program Comprehension · doi:10.1145/3524610.3527909 · Cited by 116
Dixon, T. L. (2015) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650215579223 · Cited by 116
Carvalho, A. R., & Santos, C. (2021) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100070 · Cited by 116
Cross-Cultural Differences in Sexual Advertising Content in a Transnational Women's Magazine
Nelson, M. R., & Paek, H. (2005) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-005-6760-5 · Cited by 116
The Hispanic Stress Inventory Version 2: Improving the assessment of acculturation stress.
Cervantes, R. C., Fisher, D. G., Padilla, A. M., & Napper, L. E. (2015) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000200 · Cited by 115
Defazio, D., Franzoni, C., & Rossi‐Lamastra, C. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04428-1 · Cited by 118
THE EFFECT OF LEARNER CHOICE ON L2 TASK ENGAGEMENT
Nakamura, S., Phung, L., & Reinders, H. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226312000042x · Cited by 122
Troisi, O., Visvizi, A., & Grimaldi, M. (2023) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-08-2023-0659 · Cited by 114
Assumptions behind Intercoder Reliability Indices
Zhao, X., Liu, J. S., & Deng, K. (2013) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679142 · Cited by 113
The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review
Teplitskiy, M., Acuna, D., Elamrani-Raoult, A., Körding, K., & Evans, J. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.014 · Cited by 113
Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities for Entry‐Level Business Analytics Positions: A Multi‐Method Study
Cegielski, C. G., & Jones‐Farmer, L. A. (2016) · Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education · doi:10.1111/dsji.12086 · Cited by 112
Analyzing public sentiments online: combining human- and computer-based content analysis
Su, L. Y.-F., Cacciatore, M. A., Liang, X., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2016) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1182197 · Cited by 112
Normative Change and Culture of Hate: An Experiment in Online Environments
Álvarez-Benjumea, A., & Winter, F. (2018) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcy005 · Cited by 117
Fletcher, M. A., Zhao, Y., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Buck, T. (2018) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.12.004 · Cited by 125
A Study of Misinformation in WhatsApp groups with a focus on the Brazilian Presidential Elections.
Machado, C. C. V., Kira, B., Narayanan, V., Kollányi, B., & Howard, P. N. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308560.3316738 · Cited by 110
Destination image through social media analytics and survey method
Lin, M. S., Liang, Y., Xue, X., Pan, B., & Schroeder, A. (2021) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-08-2020-0861 · Cited by 118
Conceptualizing “Dark Platforms”. Covid-19-Related Conspiracy Theories on 8kun and Gab
Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2021) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1938165 · Cited by 125
Linvill, D. L., Boatwright, B., Grant, W. J., & Warren, P. L. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.027 · Cited by 109
Scharkow, M. (2011) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9545-7 · Cited by 109
Reliability Measurement without Limits
Reidsma, D., & Carletta, J. (2008) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.2008.34.3.319 · Cited by 109
Maritime safety and the ISM code: a study of investigated casualties and incidents
Batalden, B.-M., & Sydnes, A. K. (2013) · WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs · doi:10.1007/s13437-013-0051-8 · Cited by 108
Free Association in Psychology and the Grid Elaboration Method
Joffé, H., & Elsey, J. W. B. (2014) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000014 · Cited by 126
Lazrus, H., Morss, R. E., Demuth, J. L., Lazo, J. K., & Bostrom, A. (2015) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12480 · Cited by 107
COVID-19, a tale of two pandemics: novel coronavirus and fake news messaging
Atehortua, N., & Patino, S. (2020) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daaa140 · Cited by 107
Wesseling, J. H., Farla, J. C. M., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.001 · Cited by 119
Crowdsourced validation of a machine-learning classification system for autism and ADHD
Duda, M., Haber, N., Daniels, J., & Wall, D. P. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.86 · Cited by 105
What your Facebook Profile Picture Reveals about your Personality
Segalin, C., Celli, F., Polonio, L., Kosiński, M., Stillwell, D. J., Sebe, N., Cristani, M., & Lepri, B. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3123266.3123331 · Cited by 106
Liking, sharing, commenting and reacting on Facebook: User behaviors’ impact on sentiment intensity
Kaur, W., Balakrishnan, V., RANA, O. F., & Sinniah, A. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.005 · Cited by 105
Content analytic approach to measuring constructs in operations and supply chain management
Tangpong, C. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.08.001 · Cited by 104
Designs for learning about climate change as a complex system
Jacobson, M. J., Markauskaitė, L., Portolese, A., Kapur, M., Lai, P. K., & Roberts, G. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.03.007 · Cited by 109
Ranieri, M., Luzzi, D., Cuomo, S., & Bruni, I. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12683 · Cited by 118
Powell, A. C., Torous, J. B., Chan, S. R., Raynor, G., Shwarts, E., Shanahan, M. E., & Landman, A. (2016) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.5176 · Cited by 103
Watts, F. M., & Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d1rp00007a · Cited by 115
Complementarity of circular economy practices: an empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturers
Yang, Y., Chen, L., Jia, F., & Xu, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1566664 · Cited by 106
ElAlfy, A., Darwish, K. M., & Weber, O. (2020) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2095 · Cited by 102
Corazza, L., Truant, E., Scagnelli, S. D., & Mio, C. (2020) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-05-2018-3488 · Cited by 102
Different patterns in the evolution of digital and non-digital ventures' business models
König, M., Ungerer, C., Baltes, G. H., & Terzidis, O. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.006 · Cited by 101
A content analysis of cross-cultural motivational studies in tourism relating to nationalities
Soldatenko, D., & Backer, E. R. (2019) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.12.004 · Cited by 101
A Content Analysis of Smoking Fetish Videos on YouTube: Regulatory Implications for Tobacco Control
Kim, K., Paek, H., & Lynn, J. (2010) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410230903544415 · Cited by 100
Theory of Mind in Social Robots: Replication of Five Established Human Tests
Banks, J. (2019) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00588-x · Cited by 100
Cheung, K. K. C., Yun, L., Liu, Q., & Chan, H. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00511-5 · Cited by 109
Teacher Scaffolding in Small-Group Work: An Intervention Study
van de Pol, J., Volman, M. L. L., Oort, F. J., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2013) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.805300 · Cited by 118
Effectiveness of corporate social media activities in increasing relational outcomes
Risius, M., & Beck, R. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.06.004 · Cited by 100
Changes in Media Portrayal of Human-wildlife Conflict During Successive Fatal Shark Bites
Sabatier, E., & Huveneers, C. P. M. (2018) · Conservation and Society · doi:10.4103/cs.cs_18_5 · Cited by 99
Express yourself: Facial expression of happiness, anger, fear, and sadness in funding pitches
Warnick, B. J., Davis, B. C., Allison, T. H., & Anglin, A. H. (2021) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106109 · Cited by 100
Salvi, A., Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., & Petruzzella, F. (2020) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/jic-12-2019-0283 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Krippendorff, K.
- Corresponding author
- Krippendorff, K.
- ORCID
- Krippendorff, K.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-433
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W4243989635
- Cited by
- 1,027
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- repository.upenn.edu
- Locations
- Human Communication Research (publishedVersion)
- ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- inter-rater reliability, reliability coefficients, interobserver agreement, reporting reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review