From global agenda-setting to domestic implementation: successes and challenges of the global health network on tobacco control
Open accessAbstract
Global policy attention to tobacco control has increased significantly since the 1990 s and culminated in the first international treaty negotiated under the auspices of the World Health Organization--the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Although the political process that led to the creation of the FCTC has been extensively researched, the FCTC's progression from an aspirational treaty towards a global health governance framework with tangible policy effects within FCTC member countries has not been well-understood to date. This article analyses the role of the global health network of tobacco control advocates and scientists, which formed during the FCTC negotiations during the late 1990 s, in translating countries' commitment to the FCTC into domestic policy change. By comparing the network's influence around two central tobacco control interventions (smoke-free environments and taxation), the study identifies several scope conditions, which have shaped the network's effectiveness around the FCTC's implementation: the complexity of the policy issue and the relative importance of non-health expertise, the required scope of domestic political buy-in, the role of the general public as network allies, and the strength of policy opposition. These political factors had a greater influence on the network's success than the evidence base for the effectiveness of tobacco control interventions. The network's variable success points to a trade-off faced by global healt…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Advocacy networks and epistemic communities have continuously improved the links between science and advocacy to advance tobacco control policy; the Uruguay case highlights how this network strengthened the links between trade and tobacco control to combat emerging pressures of trade on health.
“Advocacy networks and epistemic communities have continuously improved the links between science and advocacy to advance tobacco control policy13149496; the Uruguay case highlights how this network strengthened the links between trade and tobacco control to combat emerging pressures of trade on health.”
From Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International (2018) · cites this paper as [94]
Constitutional courts upheld strong tobacco control policies in fourteen countries.
“Constitutional courts upheld strong tobacco control policies in fourteen countries.17199399”
From Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International (2018) · cites this paper as [94]
The united front between local and international health organisations demonstrates the value of the transnational tobacco control network in combating tobacco industry interference and supporting FCTC implementation, especially in low-income and middle-income countries.
“The united front between local and international health organisations demonstrates the value of the transnational tobacco control network in combating tobacco industry interference and supporting FCTC implementation,139495 especially in low-income and middle-income countries.192057”
From Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International (2018) · cites this paper as [94]
Cites
Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers
Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403723101 · Cited by 2,103 · see citing works
Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012
Ng, M., Freeman, M. K., Fleming, T. D., Robinson, M., Dwyer-Lindgren, L., Thomson, B., Wollum, A., Sanman, E., Wulf, S., Lopez, A. D., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284692 · Cited by 1,576 · see citing works
The role of organized civil society in tobacco control in Latin America and the Caribbean
Champagne, B. M., Sebrié, E., & Schoj, V. (2010) · Salud Pública de México · doi:10.1590/s0036-36342010000800031 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Crosbie, E., Sosa, P., & Glantz, S. A. (2018) · Tobacco control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053690 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gneiting, U.
- Affiliations
- Oxfam America (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gneiting, Uwe
- Venue
- Health Policy and Planning
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-08-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- i74-i86
- ISSN
- 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2237
- PMC
- PMC4954556
- OpenAlex
- W2166726489
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Keywords
- tobacco control, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, global health networks, policy implementation, smoke-free areas, tobacco taxation, global health governance, agenda setting, policy opposition
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Health Policy, Humans, Policy Making, Public Health, Taxes, Global Health, Internationality, Smoke-Free Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review