The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive approaches to school health promotion: how to achieve broader implementation?
Open accessAbstract
The Health Promoting School (HPS) and Comprehensive School Health Program (CSHP) initiatives have been proposed as a means of going beyond some of the limitations associated with health promotion initiatives aimed at school-aged children. This involves moving beyond practices that rely mainly on classroom-based health education models, to a more comprehensive, integrated approach of health promotion that focuses both on child-youth attitudes and behaviors, and their environment. Despite the tremendous potential of these initiatives in terms of health and educational gains, only rarely are they actually put into practice. This article briefly reviews the features of these initiatives, as well as the extent of their implementation and current benefits. Against that backdrop, the authors identify some issues to consider and propose four conditions with a view to achieving broader practical application of these approaches. These issues, which are discussed from the standpoint of potential avenues of further study and courses of action, relate to the comprehensive, integrated nature of the intervention, the school/family/community partnership, political and financial support from policy makers, and, finally, evaluative research as a support to implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health promotion from the perspective of Social Cognitive Theory
Bandura, A. (1998) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870449808407422 · Cited by 3,087
Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., & Flewelling, R. L. (1994) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.84.9.1394 · Cited by 655
Settings as an Important Dimension in Health Education/Promotion Policy, Programs, and Research
Mullen, P. D., Evans, D., Forster, J., Gottlieb, N. H., Kreuter, M., Moon, R., O'Rourke, T., & Strecher, V. J. (1995) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019819402200306 · Cited by 115 · cited 1×
“Effective collaboration between schools, parents and other key community stakeholders, which is at the heart of such initiatives, should also be the focus of indepth research, with a view to providing a solid foundation for developing this aspect further (Mullen et al., 1995; Gottlieb et al., 1999).”
Background
Cited by
Langford, R., Bonell, C. P., Jones, H. E., Pouliou, T., Murphy, S. M., Waters, E., Komro, K. A., Gibbs, L. F., Magnus, D., & Campbell, R. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008958.pub2 · Cited by 768
Implementation of school based physical activity interventions: A systematic review
Naylor, P.-J., Nettlefold, L., Race, D., Hoy, C., Ashe, M. C., Wharf Higgins, J., & McKay, H. A. (2015) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.034 · Cited by 550
Settings for health promotion: an analytic framework to guide intervention design and implementation
Poland, B., Krupa, G., & McCall, D. (2009) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839909341025 · Cited by 295
Reed, K. E., Warburton, D. E. R., Macdonald, H. M., Naylor, P. J., & McKay, H. A. (2008) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.020 · Cited by 124
Pucher, K. K., Boot, N. M. W. M., & De Vries, N. K. (2013) · Health Education · doi:10.1108/he-02-2012-0013 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Deschesnes, M.
- Venue
- Health Promotion International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387-396
- ISSN
- 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2245
- OpenAlex
- W2111882771
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
