The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding health literacy: an expanded model
Open accessAbstract
A long and yet unfinished history of investigating how individual capabilities and social processes explain or predict health indicates that poor education, low literacy, poor health and early death are strongly linked around the world. However, the complexity of those relationships is not fully understood. In this article, we propose an expanded model of health literacy characterized by four domains: fundamental literacy (reading, writing, speaking and numeracy), science literacy, civic literacy and cultural literacy. To explore the utility of this model, we examine selected pieces of the public discourse about terrorism and bioterrorism that dominated the mass media during the anthrax threat in the United States during 2001. We conclude that this model of health literacy is useful to analyze health communication, to aid in constructing more understandable and appropriate health communication, and ultimately can lead to the development of a new measure to assess health literacy skills in individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diviani, N., van den Putte, B., Giani, S., & van Weert, J. C. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4018 · Cited by 638
Rodriguez, C. J., Allison, M., Daviglus, M. L., Isasi, C. R., Keller, C., Leira, E. C., Palaniappan, L., Piña, I. L., Ramirez, S. M., Rodriguez, B., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000071 · Cited by 426
The Nuances of Health Literacy, Nutrition Literacy, and Food Literacy
Velardo, S. (2015) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2015.04.328 · Cited by 376
Deconstructing Race and Ethnicity: Implications for Measurement of Health Outcomes
Manly, J. J. (2006) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245427.22788.be · Cited by 171
Gallagher-Thompson, D., Tzuang, Y. M., Au, A., Brodaty, H., Charlesworth, G., Gupta, R., Lee, S. E., Losada, A., & Shyu, Y.-I. (2012) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2012.678190 · Cited by 128
eHealth and health literacy: a research methodology review
Mackert, M., Champlin, S. E., Holton, A., Muñoz, I. I., & Damásio, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12044 · Cited by 111
Bittlingmayer, U. H., Dadaczynski, K., Sahrai, D., van den Broucke, S., & Okan, O. (2020) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-019-03087-6 · Cited by 103
Use of Plain-Language Guidelines to Promote Health Literacy
Grene, M., Cleary, Y., & Marcus-Quinn, A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2017.2761578 · Cited by 58
The making of expert patients: The role of online health communities in arthritis self-management
Willis, E. (2014) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105313496446 · Cited by 48
Yashadhana, A., Fields, T., Blitner, G., Stanley, R., & Zwi, A. B. (2020) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001999 · Cited by 47
Assessing the performance of health technology assessment organizations: A framework
Lafortune, L., Farand, L., Mondou, I., Sicotte, C., & Battista, R. (2008) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462307080105 · Cited by 37
Kamin, T., Koroušić Seljak, B., & Fidler Mis, N. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14071346 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Zarcadoolas, C., Pleasant, A., & Greer, D. S.
- Venue
- Health Promotion International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-03-23
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-203
- ISSN
- 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2245
- OpenAlex
- W2133304293
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
