Cited by 25Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Process evaluation of FATaintPHAT, a computer-tailored intervention to prevent excessive weight gain among Dutch adolescents

Open access
Ezendam, N. P. M., Noordegraaf, V. S. A., Kroeze, W., Brug, J., Oenema, A.·2013·Health Promotion International

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Process evaluations can help us to better interpret intervention effects and provide guidance in improving interventions. This study describes the use and appreciation of FATaintPHAT, a computer-tailored intervention to prevent excessive weight gain in adolescents and link these data to the intervention effects. Use and appreciation were assessed among students (12-13 years old) from the intervention group of the FATaintPHAT evaluation study, using computer log (n = 458) and questionnaire data (n = 233, 48% response). Differences in use and appreciation between socio-demographic groups (gender, education, ethnicity, weight category), and associations with behavioural outcomes were analysed using descriptive and regression analyses. The results showed that a majority of the students (81%) was exposed to all intervention modules and 73% reported to have put the advice into practise. Half and one-third of the students appreciated the tailored advice positively and neutrally, respectively. Students attending vocational training appreciated FATaintPHAT better than students attending university preparation education. No associations were found between behavioural outcomes with appreciation and use. In conclusion, the school-based FATainPHAT intervention was used and appreciated well among adolescents. The fact that the intervention was appreciated better among the lower compared with higher educated students indicates that the technique of computer-tailoring is also suitable for lower educated students. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, ISRCTN 15743786.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapro/das021

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study supports previous findings about the importance of appealing learning materials for program implementation.

    “The study supports previous findings about the importance of appealing learning materials for program implementation [30, 32, 33]”

    From Balancing Fidelity and Adaptation: Action‐Oriented Research Towards Implementing a Nutrition Education Program Among Adolescents (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    No passage from our copy addresses whether appealing learning materials are important for program implementation. Searches for appealing or attractive materials and implementation returned no relevant paper text, so the attributed finding cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ezendam, N. P. M., Noordegraaf, V. S. A., Kroeze, W., Brug, J., & Oenema, A.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Ezendam, N. P. M.
Venue
Health Promotion International
Published
2012-06-11
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
26-35
ISSN
  • 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2245
OpenAlex
W2146639994
Cited by
25
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Health Promotion International (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
computer-tailored intervention, adolescent obesity, school-based intervention, intervention use, sociodemographic differences, vocational education students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Behavior Therapy, Child, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Diet, Educational Status, Female, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Surveys and Questionnaires, School Health Services, Sex Factors, Health Behavior, Exercise, Logistic Models, Risk Reduction Behavior, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review