Process evaluation of FATaintPHAT, a computer-tailored intervention to prevent excessive weight gain among Dutch adolescents
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Process evaluations can help us to better interpret intervention effects and provide guidance in improving interventions. This study describes the use and appreciation of FATaintPHAT, a computer-tailored intervention to prevent excessive weight gain in adolescents and link these data to the intervention effects. Use and appreciation were assessed among students (12-13 years old) from the intervention group of the FATaintPHAT evaluation study, using computer log (n = 458) and questionnaire data (n = 233, 48% response). Differences in use and appreciation between socio-demographic groups (gender, education, ethnicity, weight category), and associations with behavioural outcomes were analysed using descriptive and regression analyses. The results showed that a majority of the students (81%) was exposed to all intervention modules and 73% reported to have put the advice into practise. Half and one-third of the students appreciated the tailored advice positively and neutrally, respectively. Students attending vocational training appreciated FATaintPHAT better than students attending university preparation education. No associations were found between behavioural outcomes with appreciation and use. In conclusion, the school-based FATainPHAT intervention was used and appreciated well among adolescents. The fact that the intervention was appreciated better among the lower compared with higher educated students indicates that the technique of computer-tailoring is also suitable for lower educated students. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, ISRCTN 15743786.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study supports previous findings about the importance of appealing learning materials for program implementation.
“The study supports previous findings about the importance of appealing learning materials for program implementation [30, 32, 33]”
From Balancing Fidelity and Adaptation: Action‐Oriented Research Towards Implementing a Nutrition Education Program Among Adolescents (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
No passage from our copy addresses whether appealing learning materials are important for program implementation. Searches for appealing or attractive materials and implementation returned no relevant paper text, so the attributed finding cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Understanding tailoring in communicating about health
Hawkins, R. P., Kreuter, M., Resnicow, K., Fishbein, M., & Dijkstra, A. (2008) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyn004 · Cited by 934 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change
Krebs, P., Prochaska, J. O., & Rossi, J. S. (2010) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004 · Cited by 854 · see citing works
Kroeze, W., Werkman, A., & Brug, J. (2006) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3103_2 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Validity of a Physical Activity Computer Questionnaire in 12- to 18-year-old Boys and Girls
Philippaerts, R. M., Matton, L., Wijndaele, K., Balduck, A.-L., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Lefevre, J. (2006) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-2005-837619 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Martens, M. (2006) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyl082 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Haerens, L., Maes, L., Vereecken, C., De Henauw, S., Moreno, L., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2009) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.020 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implementation of school based physical activity interventions: A systematic review
Naylor, P.-J., Nettlefold, L., Race, D., Hoy, C., Ashe, M. C., Wharf Higgins, J., & McKay, H. A. (2015) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.034 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Driessen‐Willems, M. D., Bartelink, N. H. M., Bessems, K. M. H. H., Kremers, S. K., & van Assema, P. (2025) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/josh.70009 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The study supports previous findings about the importance of appealing learning materials for program implementation [30, 32, 33], where this study found that not only is it important that students like the materials, but also that teachers’ expectations of students’ appreciation are positive.”
- Authors
- Ezendam, N. P. M., Noordegraaf, V. S. A., Kroeze, W., Brug, J., & Oenema, A.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Ezendam, N. P. M.
- Venue
- Health Promotion International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-06-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-35
- ISSN
- 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2245
- OpenAlex
- W2146639994
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Health Promotion International (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- computer-tailored intervention, adolescent obesity, school-based intervention, intervention use, sociodemographic differences, vocational education students
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Behavior Therapy, Child, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Diet, Educational Status, Female, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Surveys and Questionnaires, School Health Services, Sex Factors, Health Behavior, Exercise, Logistic Models, Risk Reduction Behavior, Overweight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review