Cited by 21Physical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Effectiveness of a computer tailored physical activity intervention in adolescents compared to a generic advice

Haerens, Leen, Maes, Lea, Vereecken, Carine, De Henauw, Stefaan, Moreno, Luis, De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse·2009·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To investigate the differences in effects of a computer tailored physical activity advice as compared to generic information in adolescents.Methods Students (mean age, 14.6+/-1.2) out of 90 classes from six different Flemish schools were randomly assigned to the tailored intervention (n=563) or the generic non-tailored intervention (n=608) condition. Both interventions included information on public health recommendations and tips on becoming more active. Participants in both groups received their assessment and feedback at baseline, at 4 weeks and at 3 months during school hours. Physical activity levels were determined using an adolescent adaptation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).Results After 4 weeks, almost all physical activity scores increased over time in both the generic and the tailored intervention group. No differences between groups were found (all F< or =0.07). After 3 months, the generic intervention was more effective for increasing 'walking in leisure time' among students not complying with recommendations. For all other physical activity scores, no differences between groups were found (all F< or =2.3).Conclusions In contrast to the expectations, changes in physical activity scores did not differ between the tailored and the non-tailored intervention group. For most of the physical activity scores increases were found in both groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.020

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haerens, L., Maes, L., Vereecken, C., De Henauw, S., Moreno, L., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I.
Affiliations
  • Research Foundation - Flanders (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Corresponding author
Haerens, Leen
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
38-41
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081050612
Cited by
21
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
computer-tailored intervention, physical activity promotion, adolescents, school-based intervention, physical activity guidelines, health behavior change
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Belgium, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Female, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Motor Activity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review