Cited by 559Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySex and Gender in HealthcareMedia Influence and Health

Gender differences in health information behaviour: a Finnish population-based survey

Ek, Stefan·2015·Health Promotion International

Abstract

Narrowing the gaps in health outcomes, including those between men and women, has been a pronounced goal on the agenda of the Finnish health authorities since the mid-1980s. But still there is a huge gap in favour of women when it comes to life expectancy at birth. People's health information behaviour, that is how people seek, obtain, evaluate, categorize and use relevant health-related information to perform desired health behaviours, is a critical prerequisite to appropriate and consistent performances of these behaviours. With respect to gender, it has been noted that men often are unwilling and lack the motivation to engage with health-related information. The purpose of this study was to investigate how gender affects health information behaviour in the Finnish population aged 18-65 years. The survey data were collected via a questionnaire which was posted to a representative cross section consisting of 1500 Finnish citizens. The statistical analysis consists of ANOVA F-tests and Fisher's exact tests. The results show that women were more interested in and reported much more active seeking of health-related information, paid more attention to potential worldwide pandemics and were much more attentive as to how the goods they purchase in everyday life affect their health than men did. Women also reported receiving far more informal health-related information from close family members, other kin and friends/workmates than men did. Thus, to succeed in public health promotion and interventions the measures taken should be much more sensitive to the gender gap in health information behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapro/dat063

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ek, S.
Affiliations
Åbo Akademi University (FI)
Corresponding author
Ek, Stefan
Venue
Health Promotion International
Published
2013-08-28
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
736-745
ISSN
  • 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2245
OpenAlex
W2162066888
Cited by
559
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Promotion International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
gender differences, health information behavior, health information seeking, women's health, health disparities, family influence on health, pandemic awareness, health promotion, Finnish population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Finland, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Sex Factors, Global Health, Health Behavior, Consumer Health Information, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review