Implementing multiple intervention strategies in Dutch public health-related policy networks
Open accessAbstract
Improving public health requires multiple intervention strategies. Implementing such an intervention mix is supposed to require a multisectoral policy network. As evidence to support this assumption is scarce, we examined under which conditions public health-related policy networks were able to implement an intervention mix. Data were collected (2009-14) from 29 Dutch public health policy networks. Surveys were used to identify the number of policy sectors, participation of actors, level of trust, networking by the project leader, and intervention strategies implemented. Conditions sufficient for an intervention mix (≥3 of 4 non-educational strategies present) were determined in a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. A multisectoral policy network (≥7 of 14 sectors present) was neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition. In multisectoral networks, additionally required was either the active participation of network actors (≥50% actively involved) or active networking by the project leader (≥monthly contacts with network actors). In policy networks that included few sectors, a high level of trust (positive perceptions of each other's intentions) was needed-in the absence though of any of the other conditions. If the network actors were also actively involved, an extra requirement was active networking by the project leader. We conclude that the multisectoral composition of policy networks can contribute to the implementation of a variety of intervention strategies, but not without additional efforts. However, policy networks that include only few sectors are also able to implement an intervention mix. Here, trust seems to be the most important condition.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Searching the COMPASSS database identified one further study that met the inclusion criteria.
“a suggestion to check the COMPASSS (Comparative Methods for Systematic Cross-Case Analysis) database; this was searched, identifying one further study that met the inclusion criteria [30].”
From The use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to address causality in complex systems: a systematic review of research on public health interventions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · see citing works
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617 · Cited by 10,274 · see citing works
Ragin, C. C. (2008) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001 · Cited by 4,595 · see citing works
Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015 · Cited by 4,006 · see citing works
Theories of the Policy Process
Sabatier, P. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780367274689 · Cited by 3,502 · see citing works
Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond
Ragin, C. C. (2008) · Cited by 3,398 · see citing works
Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques
Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009) · SAGE Publications · doi:10.4135/9781452226569 · Cited by 3,089 · see citing works
Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139004244 · Cited by 2,862 · see citing works
Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide
Lewis, M. W. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707712 · Cited by 2,562 · see citing works
The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x · Cited by 2,403 · see citing works
Swinburn, B., Egger, G. J., & Raza, F. (1999) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1999.0585 · Cited by 2,271 · see citing works
Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: An ecosocial perspective
Krieger, N. (2001) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/30.4.668 · Cited by 2,155 · see citing works
Planning health promotion programs an intervention mapping approach
Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. (2006) · Cited by 2,038 · see citing works
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393698 · Cited by 1,902 · see citing works
Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage
Ragin, C. C. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpj019 · Cited by 1,784 · see citing works
Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012) · Cited by 1,345 · see citing works
Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273 · Cited by 1,176 · see citing works
A Review of Collaborative Partnerships as a Strategy for Improving Community Health
Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369 · Cited by 1,134 · see citing works
Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update
Squires, J. E., Estabrooks, C. A., Gustavsson, P., & Wallin, L. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-1 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies From Social and Behavioral Research
(2000) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e720012007-001 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Governance Networks in the Public Sector
Klijn, E., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315887098 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Self-citationTrust Within And Between Organizations
(1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198293187.001.0001 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Network Power in Collaborative Planning
Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x0202100301 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
THE IMPACT OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT ON OUTCOMES IN GOVERNANCE NETWORKS
Klijn, E., Steijn, B., & Edelenbos, J. (2010) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01826.x · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Self-citationPublic Management and Educational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Networking
Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2003) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00332 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Does Trust Improve Business Performance?*
Sako, M. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198293187.003.0004 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Assessing the Robustness of Crisp-set and Fuzzy-set QCA Results
Skaaning, S.-E. (2011) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124111404818 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
What Explains Community Coalition Effectiveness?
Zakocs, R. C., & Edwards, E. M. (2006) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.004 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Klijn, E., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2010) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399710362716 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE LIMITATIONS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT NETWORKS
McGuire, M., & Agranoff, R. J. (2011) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01917.x · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Trust within and between Organizations : Conceptual Issues and Empirical Application
Türk, K. [. ]. (2009) · heiDOK (Heidelberg University) · doi:10.11588/heidok.00008633 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Health policy – why research it and how: health political science
de Leeuw, E., Clavier, C., & Breton, É. (2014) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/1478-4505-12-55 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks
Gage, R. W., Mandell, M. P., & Krane, D. A. (1990) · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Jackson, S. F., Perkins, F., Khandor, E., Cordwell, L., Hamann, S. L., & Buasai, S. (2006) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dal054 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Provan, K. G., Huang, K., & Milward, H. B. (2009) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mun036 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness
McQueen, D. V., & Jones, C. M. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70974-1_1 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Intersectoral governance for health in all policies - structures, actions and experiences
Cohn, A. (2013) · Revista de Direito Sanitário · doi:10.11606/issn.2316-9044.v14i1p264-267 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Theories of the policy process in health promotion research: a review
Breton, É., & de Leeuw, E. (2010) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daq051 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Lucidarme, J., Scott, K. J., Ure, R., Smith, A. H., Lindsay, D., Stenmark, B., Jacobsson, S., Fredlund, H., Cameron, J. C., Smith‐Palmer, A., et al. (2016) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2016.21.45.30395 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Carey, G. E., Crammond, B. R., & Keast, R. L. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1087 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement
Hayes, S. L., Mann, M. K., Morgan, F. M., Kelly, M. J., & Weightman, A. L. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007825.pub6 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Tubbing, L., Harting, J., & Stronks, K. (2015) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.12.020 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationAarts, M.-J., Jeurissen, M., OERS, H. A. M. V., Schuit, A. J., & van de Goor, I. A. M. (2010) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.011 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Akkerman, A., & Torenvlied, R. (2012) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.677213 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
de Leeuw, E. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70974-1_5 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement
Hayes, S. L., Mann, M. K., Morgan, F. M., et al. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007825.pub5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Edelenbos, J., Van Buuren, A. and Van Schie, N. (2010). Knowledge synchronisation: interactive knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders Knowledge Democracy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 153-167.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hanckel, B., Petticrew, M., Thomas, J., & Green, J. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10926-2 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harting, J., Peters, D., Grêaux, K., van Assema, P., Verweij, S., Stronks, K., & Klijn, E.-H.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Harting, Janneke
- Venue
- Health Promotion International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-10-13
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-203
- ISSN
- 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2245
- OpenAlex
- W2763538506
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Health Promotion International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ZonMw
- Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (201000002)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Keywords
- intersectoral collaboration, policy implementation, trust, public health policy
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Policy, Humans, Leadership, Netherlands, Public Health, Community Networks, Trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
