Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 37Music Therapy and HealthWorkplace Health and Well-beingArt Therapy and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An evaluation of workplace choir singing amongst Health Service staff in Ireland

Moss, Hilary, O’Donoghue, Jessica·2020·Health Promotion International

Abstract

This paper explores the well-being [‘well-being’ and ‘wellbeing’ are used interchangeably in the literature. Well-being is used in this paper (except in the reference list where exact wording is maintained)] benefits of participation in a workplace choir for health service staff. A mixed method study, this project combines quantitative measures of work engagement, perceived stress, resilience levels and work absences with qualitative interviews with choir participants. It is the first study of workplace choirs in Ireland and one of very few studies internationally that research health service staff choirs. There is some preliminary evidence of benefits that choir attendance may increase positive perception of workers’ mental health as well as effect depression rates. However, evidence is limited quantitatively and difficulties in measuring the health benefits of arts interventions are noted. Qualitative data, however, confirms previous study findings, namely that a workplace choir can promote social connectedness, enjoyment at work and staff engagement. Work place choir was also noted to appeal mainly to a limited demographic of work place staff and people with relatively positive health and well-being. Efforts must be made to engage staff from lower socio-economic backgrounds, diverse cultural backgrounds and male staff in work place health promotion activities, as these groups were found less likely to join a work place choir. Given the low cost and low risk of this activity, and the qualitative benefits reported, it is recommended to continue to develop and evaluate health service workplace choirs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapro/daz044

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bailey, 2002, Adaptive characteristics of group singing: perceptions from members of a choir for homeless men, Musicae Scientae, 6, 221, 10.1177/102986490200600206 · DOI
  2. Barry, 2009, SLÁN 2007: Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition in Ireland. Mental Health and Social Well-being Report
  3. Camic, 2013, Does a ‘singing together group’ improve the quality of life of people with a dementia and their carers? A pilot evaluation study, Dementia, 12, 157, 10.1177/1471301211422761 · DOI
  4. Clift, 2001, The perceived benefits of singing: findings from preliminary surveys of a university college choral society, The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 121, 248, 10.1177/146642400112100409 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Clift, 2008, Choral Singing, Well-being and Health: Summary of Findings From a Cross-national Study
  6. Clift, 2010, Choral singing and psychological wellbeing: quantitative and qualitative findings from English choirs in a cross-national survey, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 1, 19, 10.1386/jaah.1.1.19/1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Clift, 2008, Health: A Systematic Mapping and Review of Non-clinical Studies
  8. Clift, 2011, Songs of Resilience
  9. Clift, 2016, The perceived effects of singing on the health and well-being of wives and partners of members of the British Armed Forces: a cross-sectional survey, Public Health, 1, 93, 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.022 · DOI
  10. Cohen, 2007, The impact of professional conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health and social functioning of older adults—2-year results, Journal of Aging, Humanities and the Arts, 1, 5, 10.1080/19325610701410791 · DOI
  11. Cohen, 2009, Choral singing and prison inmates: influences of performing in a prison choir, Journal of Correctional Education (1974), 60, 52
  12. Cohen, 1983, A global measure of perceived stress, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385, 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Coulton, 2015, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community singing on mental health-related quality of life of older people: randomised controlled trial, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 207, 250, 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.129908 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Crawford, 2015, Health Humanities
  15. De Medeiros, 2014, “Shall I compare thee to a dose of donepezil?”: cultural arts interventions in dementia care research, Gerontologist, 54, 344, 10.1093/geront/gnt055 · DOI
  16. Evans, 2011, Can group singing provide effective speech therapy for people with Parkinson’s disease?, Arts & Health, 4, 83, 10.1080/17533015.2011.584883 · DOI
  17. Giaver, 2017, Choral singing as an arts-based organisational intervention: a qualitative study of employees’ experiences, Arts & Health, 9, 26, 10.1080/17533015.2016.1182564 · DOI
  18. Goldenberg, 2018, Singing lessons for respiratory health: a literature review, Journal of Voice, 32, 85, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.03.021 · DOI
  19. Gouk, 2000, Musical Healing in Cultural Contexts
  20. Horden, 2000, The History of Music Therapy Since Antiquity
  21. Irons, 2010, Singing for children and adults with bronchiectasis (review), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, 1
  22. Irons, 2010, Singing for children and adults with cystic fibrosis (review), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, 1
  23. Lewis, 2016, Singing for lung health: a systematic review of the literature and consensus statement, NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 26, 16080, 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.80 · DOI
  24. Moss, 2018, Exploring the perceived health benefits of singing in a choir: an international cross-sectional mixed-methods study, Perspectives in Public Health, 138, 160, 10.1177/1757913917739652 · DOI
  25. Theorell, 2009, A note on designing evaluations of health effects of cultural activities at work, Arts & Health, 1, 89, 10.1080/17533010802527993 · DOI
  26. Vella-Burrows, 2015, Choir of the Year Competition 2014: An Evaluation of Well-being Effects
  27. Welch, 2014, Singing and social inclusion, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 803, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00803 · DOI

Cited by

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Moss, H., & O’Donoghue, J.
Affiliations
University of Limerick (IE)
Corresponding author
Moss, Hilary
Venue
Health Promotion International
Published
2019-05-27
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
527-534
ISSN
  • 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2245
OpenAlex
W2947170856
Cited by
37
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Promotion International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Service Executive Ireland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
healthcare workers, employee well-being, work engagement, perceived stress, resilience, absenteeism, mental health, arts-based interventions, social connectedness, workplace health promotion, barriers to participation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Promotion, Health Services, Humans, Ireland, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Personnel, Hospital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Workplace, Sick Leave, Qualitative Research, Singing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evaluation of workplace choir singing amongst Health Service staff in Ireland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/heapro/daz044
The paper
Moss, H., & O’Donoghue, J. (2020). An evaluation of workplace choir singing amongst Health Service staff in Ireland. Health Promotion International. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz044