Cited by 144Music Therapy and HealthDiverse Music Education InsightsArt Therapy and Mental Health

Benefits of choral singing for social and mental wellbeing: qualitative findings from a cross-national survey of choir members

Livesey, Laetitia, Morrison, Ian, Clift, Stephen, Camic, Paul·2012·Journal of Public Mental Health

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to explore the benefits of choral singing for mental wellbeing and health as perceived by a cross‐national sample of amateur choral singers. Design/methodology/approach Data consisted of written responses to open‐ended questions. These were derived from 169 participants selected from a larger dataset reporting high and low levels of emotional wellbeing on the WHOQOL‐BREF questionnaire. A majority of participants were female and aged over 50. A thematic analysis was followed by a content analysis and Pearson chi square analyses. Comparisons were made between different ages, genders and nationalities and participants with high and low reported emotional wellbeing. Findings The analysis revealed multiple themes covering perceived benefits in social, emotional, physical, and cognitive domains. There were no significant differences in frequency of themes across any of the participant sociodemographic and wellbeing categories. The results indicate that benefits of singing may be experienced similarly irrespective of age, gender, nationality or wellbeing status. Research limitations/implications Implications for further research include future use of validated instruments to measure outcomes and research into the benefits of singing in other cultures. The results of this study suggest that choral singing could be used to promote mental health and treat mental illness. Originality/value This study examines a cross‐national sample which is larger than previous studies in this area. These findings contribute to understanding of the complex and interacting factors which might contribute to wellbeing and health, as well as specific benefits of singing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17465721211207275

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livesey, L., Morrison, I., Clift, S., & Camic, P.
Affiliations
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Public Mental Health
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2012-03-16
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
10-26
ISSN
1746-5729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103507500
Cited by
144
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Public Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
choral singing, amateur choirs, psychological well-being, emotional well-being, social well-being, mental health promotion, psychiatric treatment, sociodemographic differences, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review