Cited by 297Music Therapy and HealthDiverse Music Education InsightsNeuroscience and Music Perception

The perceived benefits of singing: findings from preliminary surveys of a university college choral society

Clift, S.M., Hancox, G.·2001·Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health

Abstract

Two exploratory studies are reported on the perceived benefits associated with active participation in choral singing. In the first study, 84 members of a uni versity college choral society completed a brief questionnaire that asked whether they had benefited personally from their involvement in the choir and whether there were ways in which participation could benefit their health. A large majority of respondents agreed they had benefited socially (87%) and emotionally (75%), with 58% agreeing they had benefited in some physical way, and 49% spiritually. A content analysis of written comments served to elaborate the ways in which choir members felt they had benefited. Common themes expressed were: meeting new people, feeling more positive, increased control over breathing, feeling more alert and feeling spiritually uplifted. With respect to health benefits, 84% of participants gave answers, the main themes of which related to improved lung function and breathing, improved mood and stress reduction. In the second study, 91 members of the choir complet ed a structured questionnaire consisting of 32 statements about singing reflecting the ideas expressed in the first study. Over 40% of respondents strongly agreed that 'singing helps to make my mood more positive', 'singing is a moving experience for me sometimes', 'singing makes me feel a lot hap pier' and 'singing is good for my soul'. A principal components analysis fol lowed by Oblimin rotation identified six dimensions of benefit associated with singing These were labelled as: benefits for well-being and relaxation, benefits for breathing and posture, social benefits, spiritual benefits, emotion al benefits, and benefits for heart and immune system. Cronbach alpha coef ficients were satisfactory for all components except the third, social benefits, due primarily to the small number of items loading on this component. Women were significantly more likely to experience benefits for well-being and relaxation, younger people were more likely to report social benefits, and those professing religious beliefs were more likely to experience spiritual ben efits. The present studies have a number of limitations, but they provide a useful foundation for future larger scale surveys, more sophisticated qualita tive studies, and experimental investigations of the impact of singing on psy cho-physiological functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/146642400112100409

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative data from singing groups and choirs suggests that social interaction and a sense of belonging are important positive features of attendance.

    “Indeed, qualitative data from singing groups and choirs suggests that social interaction and a sense of belonging are important positive features of attendance [48–50].”

    From The ice-breaker effect: Singing mediates fast social bonding (2015) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clift, S. M., & Hancox, G.
Affiliations
Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
Published
2001-12
Volume
121
Issue
4
Pages
248-256
ISSN
1466-4240 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147552987
Cited by
297
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canterbury Christ Church University
  • Durham University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
choral singing, choir participation, health benefits, well-being, relaxation, social benefits, emotional benefits, spiritual benefits, breathing, mood, stress reduction, lung function, religious beliefs, gender differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Music, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review