Cited by 96School Health and Nursing EducationAdolescent Health and BehaviorsCommunity Health and Development

The changing meanings of participation in school-based health education and health promotion: the participants' voices

Simovska, V.·2006·Health Education Research

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of student participation and learning about health from the perspective of health-promoting schools. The combination of the democratic approach to health-promoting schools, characterized by the concepts of student participation and action competence, and the sociocultural theory of learning provides the conceptual framework for the discussion. The two sets of concepts help the building of a heuristic that views teaching and learning as mutually constitutive, establishing an integrated unit of analysis. Data are generated from a Web-based international project 'Young Minds exploring links between youth, culture and health'. The project has its roots in the European Network of Health Promoting Schools (ENHPS). The methodological framework is constructed as theoretically based qualitative case study, using Web contents analysis and interviews with the participating teachers and students. A model distinguishing between two different qualities of student participation-token and genuine-is used as an analytical tool in analyzing the empirical data. The analysis of the case study illuminated the trajectories of participation in which students learned about health in intentional, relational and purposeful ways. These participation trajectories were viewed as situated in activity structures consisting of a variety of mutual interactions and different forms of participation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cym023

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Model of Student Participation focused on the process of collecting, analysing and contextualizing health data in 'intentional, relational, and purposeful ways' that foster genuine youth participation.

    “The model also focused on the process of collecting, analysing and contextualizing health data in ‘intentional, relational, and purposeful ways’ that foster genuine youth participation. 78”

    From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [78]

    The ‘Forms of interaction and peer collaboration’ section describes students gathering information on health issues, summarizing findings and discussing them with peers. The Abstract and concluding reflections say students learned about health in ‘intentional, relational and purposeful ways.’ But the paper presents the participation model as a tool for distinguishing genuine from token participation, not as a model focused specifically on collecting, analysing and contextualizing health data; the quoted words describe students’ learning, not the model’s focus. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Vygotsky's sociocultural theory of learning was applied to youth participation in health education.

    “In the included paper, the theory was applied to youth participation in health education. 78”
  • The Model of Student Participation identified three points of differentiation between 'token' and 'genuine' youth participation in school-based health promotion: focus, outcomes and target of change.

    “The Model of Student Participation 78 identified three points of differentiation between ‘token’ and ‘genuine’ youth participation in school‐based health promotion, namely, focus, outcomes and target of change.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Simovska V. Learning by interaction: learning about health through participation and action-the health promoting schools perspective. The Danish University of Education: Copenhagen, 2005 Doctoral Dissertation.
  2. Brown AL, Ash D, Rutherford M et al. Distributed expertise in the classroom. In: Salomon G (ed). Dis- tributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 188-229.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simovska, V.
Corresponding author
Simovska, V.
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2006-08-08
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
864-878
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2101870596
Cited by
96
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
Keywords
student participation, health promoting schools, health education, health promotion, action competence, sociocultural theory, democratic approach
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Culture, Europe, Faculty, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, International Cooperation, Interviews as Topic, Learning, School Health Services, Students, World Health Organization, Health Behavior, Models, Educational, Organizational Case Studies, Internet, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review