Cited by 41Community Health and DevelopmentPublic Health and NutritionPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Community-based health programmes: role perceptions and experiences of female peer facilitators in Mumbai's urban slums

Open access
Alcock, G. A., More, N. S., Patil, S., Porel, M., Vaidya, L., Osrin, D.·2009·Health Education Research

Abstract

Community-based initiatives have become a popular approach to addressing the health needs of underserved populations, in both low- and higher-income countries. This article presents findings from a study of female peer facilitators involved in a community-based maternal and newborn health intervention in urban slum areas of Mumbai. Using qualitative methods we explore their role perceptions and experiences. Our findings focus on how the facilitators understand and enact their role in the community setting, how they negotiate relationships and health issues with peer groups, and the influence of credibility. We contextualize this within broader conceptualizations of peer-led health interventions and offer recommendations for similar community-based health initiatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cyp038

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Cooperrider DL Whitney D Stavros JM Fry R Appreciative Inquiry Handbook: The First in a Series of AI Workshops for Leaders of Change 2004 Cleveland, OH Lakeshore Communications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alcock, G. A., More, N. S., Patil, S., Porel, M., Vaidya, L., & Osrin, D.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Society for Nutrition Education and Health Action (IN)
Corresponding author
Alcock, G. A.
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2009-08-03
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
957-966
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2109109572
Cited by
41
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (081052)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
community health programs, maternal and newborn health, urban slums, role perception, credibility, peer relationships, underserved populations, Mumbai
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, India, Interviews as Topic, Maternal Welfare, Maternal-Child Health Centers, Peer Group, Poverty Areas, Role, Urban Population, Focus Groups, Community Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review