CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 119Physical Activity and HealthChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentPhysical Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term effects of physically active academic lessons on physical fitness and executive functions in primary school children

de Greeff, J. W., Hartman, E., Mullender-Wijnsma, M. J., Bosker, R. J., Doolaard, S., Visscher, C.·2016·Health Education Research
DOI 10.1093/her/cyv102
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Integrating physical activity into the curriculum has potential health and cognitive benefits in primary school children. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of physically active academic lessons on cardiovascular fitness, muscular fitness and executive functions. In the current randomized controlled trial, 499 second and third graders within 12 primary schools (mean age = 8.1 ± 0.7) were randomized to the intervention (n = 249) or control condition (n = 250). The physically active academic lessons were given for 2 consecutive school years, 22 weeks per year, three times a week, with a duration of 20-30 min per lesson. Multiple tests were administered before, between and after the intervention period, measuring cardiovascular fitness, muscular fitness and executive functions. Multilevel analysis accounted for the nested structure of the children within classes and schools. Results showed a larger improvement in speed-coordination (B = -0.70,P = 0.002) and a lower improvement in static strength (B = -0.92,P < : 0.001) for the intervention group compared with the control group. The current lessons did not result in a significant change in executive functions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cyv102

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
de Greeff, J. W., Hartman, E., Mullender-Wijnsma, M. J., Bosker, R. J., Doolaard, S., & Visscher, C.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
de Greeff, J. W.
ORCID
Venue
Health Education Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2016-01-29
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
185-194
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
DOI
10.1093/her/cyv102
OpenAlex
W2307275909
Cited by
119
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Physical Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
elementary school students, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular fitness, executive function, speed coordination, static strength
MeSH terms
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Child, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Physical Fitness, Schools, Program Evaluation, Exercise, Muscle Strength, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review