Cited by 293Physical Activity and HealthPhysical Education and PedagogySchool Health and Nursing Education

Physically active lessons in schools and their impact on physical activity, educational, health and cognition outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Norris, Emma, van Steen, Tommy, Direito, Artur, Stamatakis, Emmanuel·2020·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Objective: This review provides the first meta-analysis of the impact of physically active lessons on lesson-time and overall physical activity (PA), as well as health, cognition and educational outcomes. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies. Six meta-analyses pooled effects on lesson-time PA, overall PA, in-class educational and overall educational outcomes, cognition and health outcomes. Meta-analyses were conducted using the metafor package in R. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for risk of bias. Data sources: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC and Web of Science, grey literature and reference lists were searched in December 2017 and April 2019. Studies eligibility criteria: Physically active lessons compared with a control group in a randomised or non-randomised design, within single component interventions in general school populations. Results: 42 studies (39 in preschool or elementary school settings, 27 randomised controlled trials) were eligible to be included in the systematic review and 37 of them were included across the six meta-analyses (n=12 663). Physically active lessons were found to produce large, significant increases in lesson-time PA ( d =2.33; 95% CI 1.42 to 3.25: k =16) and small, increases on overall PA ( d =0.32; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.46: k =8), large, improvement in lesson-time educational outcomes ( d =0.81; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.14: k =7) and a small improvement in overall educational outcomes ( d =0.36; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.63: k =25). No effects were seen on cognitive (k=3) or health outcomes (k=3). 25/42 studies had high risk of bias in at least two domains. Conclusion: In elementary and preschool settings, when physically active lessons were added into the curriculum they had positive impact on both physical activity and educational outcomes. These findings support policy initiatives encouraging the incorporation of physically active lessons into teaching in elementary and preschool setting. Trial registration number: CRD42017076933.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100502

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]25. Norris E, van Steen T, Direito A, et al. Effects of physically active lessons on activity, health and education outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 2017;88:149-68.
  2. [44]44. House. Protected by copyright. on October 17, 2019 at Stella Welsh The Library/Bournemouth http://bjsm.bmj.com/ Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100502 on 16 October 2019. Downloaded from Review 44

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norris, E., van Steen, T., Direito, A., & Stamatakis, E.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Norris, Emma
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-10-16
Volume
54
Issue
14
Pages
826-838
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2980741700
Cited by
293
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
school-based physical activity, educational outcomes, cognitive outcomes, health outcomes, preschool children, elementary school students, curriculum integration, physical education
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Curriculum, Educational Status, Humans, Physical Education and Training, Schools, Health Behavior, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review