The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiplex PCR amplification from the CFTR gene using DNA prepared from buccal brushes/swabs
Abstract
Traditionally, DNA used for PCR-based diagnostic analysis has originated from white cells fractionated from whole blood. Although this method yields substantial quantities of DNA, there are some drawbacks to the procedure, including the inconvenience of drawing blood, risk of exposure to blood-borne pathogens, liquid sample handling, and the somewhat involved extraction procedure. Alternatively, DNA for genetic diagnosis has been derived from finger stick blood samples, hair roots, cheek scrapings, and urine samples. Oral saline rinses have also been used extensively as a means of collecting buccal epithelial cells as a DNA source. However, this method still requires liquid sample handling. Herein, we present our results involving the rapid extraction of DNA from buccal cells collected on cytology brushes and swabs for use in PCR reactions, specifically the multiplex amplification of 5 exons within the CFTR gene. The quality of DNA isolated from buccal cells, collected in this manner, has been sufficient to reproducibly support multiplex amplification. Cheek cell samples and the DNA prepared from them as described here are highly stable. The success rate of PCR amplification on DNA prepared from buccal cells is 99%. In a blind study comparing the analysis of 12 mutations responsible for cystic fibrosis in multiplex products amplified with DNA from both blood and buccal cell samples from 464 individuals, there was 100% correlation of results for blood and cheek cell DNA, validating the use of DNA extracted from cheek cells collected on cytology brushes for use in genetic testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Germline p16 mutations in familial melanoma
Hussussian, C. J., Struewing, J. P., Goldstein, A. M., Higgins, P. A. T., Ally, D. S., Sheahan, M. D., Clark, W. H., Tucker, M. A., & Dracopoli, N. C. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0994-15 · Cited by 977
APOE -ε4 count predicts age when prevalence of AD increases, then declines: The Cache County Study
Breitner, J. C. S., Wyse, B. W., Anthony, J. C., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., Steffens, D. C., Norton, M. C., Tschanz, J. T., Plassman, B. L., Meyer, M. R., Skoog, I., et al. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.53.2.321 · Cited by 397
Complete sequencing shows a role for MSX1 in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate
Jezewski, P. A., Vieira, A. R., Nishimura, C., Ludwig, B., Johnson, M., O’Brien, S. E., Daack-Hirsch, S., Schultz, R. E., Weber, A., Nepomucena, B., et al. (2003) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.40.6.399 · Cited by 304
Pulkkinen, L., Christiano, A. M., Airenne, T., Haakana, H., Tryggvason, K., & Uitto, J. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0394-293 · Cited by 296
Apolipoprotein E allele ∈4, dementia, and cognitive decline in a population sample
Henderson, A. S., Jorm, A. F., Korten, A. E., Christensen, H., Jacomb, P. A., Easteal, S., Croft, L., & Mackinnon, A. J. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92405-1 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, B., Skoletsky, J., Shuber, A. P., Balfour, R., Stern, R. C., Dorkin, H. L., Parad, R. B., Witt, D., & Klinger, K. W.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-163
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2019955688
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiplex PCR amplification from the CFTR gene using DNA prepared from buccal brushes/swabs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/2.2.159
- The paper
- Richards, B., Skoletsky, J., Shuber, A. P., Balfour, R., Stern, R. C., Dorkin, H. L., Parad, R. B., Witt, D., & Klinger, K. W. (1993). Multiplex PCR amplification from the CFTR gene using DNA prepared from buccal brushes/swabs. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/2.2.159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.