Cited by 179Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Normal phenotype in two brothers with a full FMR1 mutation

Open access
Smeets, H. J. M., Smits, A. P. T., Verheij, C. E., Theelen, J. P. G., Willemsen, R., Burgt, I. v. d., Hoogeveen, A. T., Oosterwijk, J. C. +1 more·1995·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

The fragile X syndrome is associated with an expanding CGG repeat in the 5' untranslated region of the first exon of the FMR1 gene. Subsequent methylation of the promoter region inhibits expression of the FMR1 gene. In two clinically normal brothers large, expanded CGG repeats and cytogenetically visible fragile sites were found. The FMR1 promoter was unmethylated and both RNA and protein could be detected. This indicates that inactivation of the FMR1 gene and not repeat expansion itself results in the fragile X phenotype. We conclude that repeat expansion does not necessarily induce methylation and that methylation is no absolute requirement for the induction of fragile sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/4.11.2103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In unmethylated full mutation alleles, H3 and H4 acetylation and H3K9 methylation resemble full mutation alleles, while H3K4 and H3K27 methylation resemble normal alleles.

    “acetylation of histones H3 and H4 and methylation of lysine 9 on H3 of UFM alleles are more similar to those of FM alleles, while the level of methylation of lysines 4 and 27 on H3 are more similar to that of normal alleles (18,22).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smeets, H. J. M., Smits, A. P. T., Verheij, C. E., Theelen, J. P. G., Willemsen, R., Burgt, I. V. D., Hoogeveen, A. T., Oosterwijk, J. C., & Oostra, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Oostra, B. A.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
1995-11-01
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
2103-2108
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2137391937
Cited by
179
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, FMR1 gene, CGG repeat expansion, promoter methylation, fragile sites, normal phenotype, gene inactivation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chromosome Mapping, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Pedigree, Phenotype, Gene Expression, RNA-Binding Proteins, Trinucleotide Repeats, Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review