Cited by 103Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

A critical role for the PAR-1/MARK-tau axis in mediating the toxic effects of Aβ on synapses and dendritic spines

Open access
Yu, Wendou, Polepalli, Jai, Wagh, Dhananjay, Rajadas, Jayakumar, Malenka, Robert, Lu, Bingwei·2012·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease and the leading cause of dementia in the elderly. Accumulating evidence supports soluble amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers as the leading candidate for the causative agent in AD and synapses as the primary site of Aβ oligomer action. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which Aβ oligomers cause synaptic dysfunction and cognitive impairments remain poorly understood. Using primary cultures of rat hippocampal neurons as a model system, we show that the partitioning defective-1 (PAR-1)/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase (MARK) family kinases act as critical mediators of Aβ toxicity on synapses and dendritic spines. Overexpression of MARK4 led to tau hyperphosphorylation, reduced expression of synaptic markers, and loss of dendritic spines and synapses, phenotypes also observed after Aβ treatment. Importantly, expression of a non-phosphorylatable form of tau with the PAR-1/MARK site mutated blocked the synaptic toxicity induced by MARK4 overexpression or Aβ treatment. To probe the involvement of endogenous MARK kinases in mediating the synaptic toxicity of Aβ, we employed a peptide inhibitor capable of effectively and specifically inhibiting the activities of all PAR-1/MARK family members. This inhibitor abrogated the toxic effects of Aβ oligomers on dendritic spines and synapses as assayed at the morphological and electrophysiological levels. Our results reveal a critical role for PAR-1/MARK kinases in AD pathogenesis and suggest PAR-1/MARK inhibitors as potential therapeutics for AD and possibly other tauopathies where aberrant tau hyperphosphorylation is involved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddr576

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in cultured neurons and transgenic Drosophila showed that Aβ-induced augmentation of tau toxicity depends on tau phosphorylation at these sites.

    “Notably, studies in cultured neurons and transgenic Drosophila showed that Aβ-induced augmentation of tau toxicity caused by Aβ depends on tau phosphorylation at these sites [39, 45, 56–58].”

    From Stabilization of Microtubule-Unbound Tau via Tau Phosphorylation at Ser262/356 by Par-1/MARK Contributes to Augmentation of AD-Related Phosphorylation and Aβ42-Induced Tau Toxicity (2016) · cites this paper as [45]

    In 'Expression of non-phosphorylatable form of tau blocks Aβ toxicity' (page not available), Aβ increased tau phosphorylation at the 12E8 sites in cultured rat hippocampal neurons, and non-phosphorylatable tau ameliorated Aβ-induced spine and synaptic-marker loss. The Introduction and 'Expression of a non-phosphorylatable form of tau blocks PAR-1/MARK toxicity' describe Drosophila evidence that PAR-1-site phosphorylation is required for tau toxicity, but do not show Aβ-induced augmentation of tau toxicity in transgenic Drosophila. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Activities of GSK3 and PAR-1/MARKs are often associated with tau detachment from microtubules and Aβ-induced augmentation of tau toxicity.

    “the activities of two major tau kinases, GSK3 and PAR-1/microtubule affinity-regulating kinases (MARKs), are often associated with tau detachment from microtubules and Aβ-induced augmentation of tau toxicity [37, 39, 43–45].”

    From Stabilization of Microtubule-Unbound Tau via Tau Phosphorylation at Ser262/356 by Par-1/MARK Contributes to Augmentation of AD-Related Phosphorylation and Aβ42-Induced Tau Toxicity (2016) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Introduction and the section ‘Expression of non-phosphorylatable form of tau blocks Aβ toxicity’ link PAR-1/MARK-mediated tau phosphorylation to tau toxicity and Aβ-induced synaptic and spine damage (page numbers unavailable). Our copy does not establish the corresponding role for GSK3 or state that either kinase causes tau to detach from microtubules. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jin, M., Shepardson, N., Yang, T., Chen, G., Walsh, D. and Selkoe, D.J. (2011) Soluble amyloid beta-protein dimers isolated from Alzheimer cortex directly induce Tau hyperphosphorylation and neuritic degeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 5819-5824.
  2. Rapoport, M., Dawson, H.N., Binder, L.I., Vitek, M.P. and Ferreira, A. (2002) Tau is essential to beta-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 6364-6369.
  3. Gylys, K.H., Fein, J.A., Yang, F., Wiley, D.J., Miller, C.A. and Cole, G.M. (2004) Synaptic changes in Alzheimer's disease: increased amyloid-beta and gliosis in surviving terminals is accompanied by decreased PSD-95 fluorescence. Am. J. Pathol., 165, 1809-1817.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, W., Polepalli, J., Wagh, D., Rajadas, J., Malenka, R., & Lu, B.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Lu, Bingwei
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2011-12-08
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1384-1390
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2114205908
Cited by
103
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McKnight Foundation
  • School of Medicine, Stanford University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063394, R01MH080378)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR054926)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta oligomers, MARK4, tau hyperphosphorylation, dendritic spines, synapses, synaptic dysfunction, hippocampal neurons, tauopathy, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Electrophysiology, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Hippocampus, Microtubules, Mutation, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Synapses, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Dendritic Spines, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review