Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA polymerase ɛ and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer

Open access
Church, David N., Briggs, Sarah E.W., Palles, Claire, Domingo, Enric, Kearsey, Stephen J., Grimes, Jonathon M., Gorman, Maggie, Martin, Lynn, Howarth, Kimberley M., Hodgson, Shirley V., Kaur, Kulvinder, Taylor, Jenny, Tomlinson, Ian P.M.·2013·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Accurate duplication of DNA prior to cell division is essential to suppress mutagenesis and tumour development. The high fidelity of eukaryotic DNA replication is due to a combination of accurate incorporation of nucleotides into the nascent DNA strand by DNA polymerases, the recognition and removal of mispaired nucleotides (proofreading) by the exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases δ and ε, and post-replication surveillance and repair of newly synthesized DNA by the mismatch repair (MMR) apparatus. While the contribution of defective MMR to neoplasia is well recognized, evidence that faulty DNA polymerase activity is important in cancer development has been limited. We have recently shown that germline POLE and POLD1 exonuclease domain mutations (EDMs) predispose to colorectal cancer (CRC) and, in the latter case, to endometrial cancer (EC). Somatic POLE mutations also occur in 5-10% of sporadic CRCs and underlie a hypermutator, microsatellite-stable molecular phenotype. We hypothesized that sporadic ECs might also acquire somatic POLE and/or POLD1 mutations. Here, we have found that missense POLE EDMs with good evidence of pathogenic effects are present in 7% of a set of 173 endometrial cancers, although POLD1 EDMs are uncommon. The POLE mutations localized to highly conserved residues and were strongly predicted to affect proofreading. Consistent with this, POLE-mutant tumours were hypermutated, with a high frequency of base substitutions, and an especially large relative excess of G:C>T:A transversions. All POLE EDM tumours were microsatellite stable, suggesting that defects in either DNA proofreading or MMR provide alternative mechanisms to achieve genomic instability and tumourigenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddt131

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Church, D. N., Briggs, S. E. W., Palles, C., Domingo, E., Kearsey, S. J., Grimes, J. M., Gorman, M., Martin, L., Howarth, K. M., Hodgson, S. V., Kaur, K., Taylor, J., & Tomlinson, I. P. M.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2013-03-24
Volume
22
Issue
14
Pages
2820-2828
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2146501164
Cited by
352
References
5
FWCI
22.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA polymerase ɛ and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/ddt131
The paper
Church, D. N., Briggs, S. E. W., Palles, C., Domingo, E., Kearsey, S. J., Grimes, J. M., Gorman, M., Martin, L., Howarth, K. M., Hodgson, S. V., Kaur, K., Taylor, J., & Tomlinson, I. P. M. (2013). DNA polymerase ɛ and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddt131

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.