The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA polymerase ɛ and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer
Open accessAbstract
Accurate duplication of DNA prior to cell division is essential to suppress mutagenesis and tumour development. The high fidelity of eukaryotic DNA replication is due to a combination of accurate incorporation of nucleotides into the nascent DNA strand by DNA polymerases, the recognition and removal of mispaired nucleotides (proofreading) by the exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases δ and ε, and post-replication surveillance and repair of newly synthesized DNA by the mismatch repair (MMR) apparatus. While the contribution of defective MMR to neoplasia is well recognized, evidence that faulty DNA polymerase activity is important in cancer development has been limited. We have recently shown that germline POLE and POLD1 exonuclease domain mutations (EDMs) predispose to colorectal cancer (CRC) and, in the latter case, to endometrial cancer (EC). Somatic POLE mutations also occur in 5-10% of sporadic CRCs and underlie a hypermutator, microsatellite-stable molecular phenotype. We hypothesized that sporadic ECs might also acquire somatic POLE and/or POLD1 mutations. Here, we have found that missense POLE EDMs with good evidence of pathogenic effects are present in 7% of a set of 173 endometrial cancers, although POLD1 EDMs are uncommon. The POLE mutations localized to highly conserved residues and were strongly predicted to affect proofreading. Consistent with this, POLE-mutant tumours were hypermutated, with a high frequency of base substitutions, and an especially large relative excess of G:C>T:A transversions. All POLE EDM tumours were microsatellite stable, suggesting that defects in either DNA proofreading or MMR provide alternative mechanisms to achieve genomic instability and tumourigenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11252 · Cited by 8,499
Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11404 · Cited by 3,994
Recurrent R-spondin fusions in colon cancer
Seshagiri, S., Stawiski, E. W., Durinck, S., Modrusan, Z., Storm, E. E., Conboy, C. B., Chaudhuri, S., Guan, Y., Janakiraman, V., Jaiswal, B. S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11282 · Cited by 960
Kunkel, T. A. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r400006200 · Cited by 754 · cited 1×
“fidelity of DNA polymerases and post-replication surveillance by the mismatch repair apparatus (1).”
BackgroundWang, J., Yu, P., Lin, T. C., Konigsberg, W. H., & Steitz, T. A. (1996) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi960178r · Cited by 99
Cited by
Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden
Chalmers, Z. R., Connelly, C. F., Fabrizio, D., Gay, L., Ali, S. M., Ennis, R., Schrock, A., Campbell, B., Shlien, A., Chmielecki, J., et al. (2017) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0424-2 · Cited by 3,519
Universal Patterns of Selection in Cancer and Somatic Tissues
Martincorena, I., Raine, K. M., Gerstung, M., Dawson, K. J., Haase, K., Van Loo, P., Davies, H., Stratton, M. R., & Campbell, P. J. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.042 · Cited by 1,523
Wang, K., Yuen, S. T., Xu, J., Lee, S. P., Yan, H. H. N., Shi, S. T., Siu, H. C., Deng, S., Chu, K. M., Law, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2983 · Cited by 1,045
Clinical Sequencing Defines the Genomic Landscape of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Yaeger, R., Chatila, W. K., Lipsyc, M. D., Hechtman, J. F., Cercek, A., Sanchez-Vega, F., Jayakumaran, G., Middha, S., Zehir, A., Donoghue, M. T. A., et al. (2018) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.12.004 · Cited by 858
Genome-wide analysis of noncoding regulatory mutations in cancer
Weinhold, N., Jacobsen, A., Schultz, N., Sander, C., & Lee, W. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3101 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Church, D. N., Briggs, S. E. W., Palles, C., Domingo, E., Kearsey, S. J., Grimes, J. M., Gorman, M., Martin, L., Howarth, K. M., Hodgson, S. V., Kaur, K., Taylor, J., & Tomlinson, I. P. M.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-03-24
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2820-2828
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2146501164
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA polymerase ɛ and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/ddt131
- The paper
- Church, D. N., Briggs, S. E. W., Palles, C., Domingo, E., Kearsey, S. J., Grimes, J. M., Gorman, M., Martin, L., Howarth, K. M., Hodgson, S. V., Kaur, K., Taylor, J., & Tomlinson, I. P. M. (2013). DNA polymerase ɛ and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddt131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.