Cited by 486Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsChromatin Remodeling and CancerCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Genome-wide analysis of noncoding regulatory mutations in cancer

Open access
Weinhold, Nils, Jacobsen, Anders, Schultz, Nikolaus, Sander, Chris, Lee, William·2014·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Cancer primarily develops because of somatic alterations in the genome. Advances in sequencing have enabled large-scale sequencing studies across many tumor types, emphasizing the discovery of alterations in protein-coding genes. However, the protein-coding exome comprises less than 2% of the human genome. Here we analyze the complete genome sequences of 863 human tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas and other sources to systematically identify noncoding regions that are recurrently mutated in cancer. We use new frequency- and sequence-based approaches to comprehensively scan the genome for noncoding mutations with potential regulatory impact. These methods identify recurrent mutations in regulatory elements upstream of PLEKHS1, WDR74 and SDHD, as well as previously identified mutations in the TERT promoter. SDHD promoter mutations are frequent in melanoma and are associated with reduced gene expression and poor prognosis. The non-protein-coding cancer genome remains widely unexplored, and our findings represent a step toward targeting the entire genome for clinical purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.3101

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic predisposition plays an important role in the initial transformation and is driven by both germline variants and multiple myeloma-specific loci influencing risk.

    “Genetic predisposition plays an important role in the initial transformation and is driven by both germline variants and MM-specific loci influencing risk.”

    From Evolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes a study of somatic regulatory mutations across cancer types, not inherited susceptibility to multiple myeloma. A search for germline variants, myeloma-specific risk loci, and initial transformation found no passage in our copy addressing that claim; the References list a multiple myeloma sequencing study but do not report the asserted finding. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A list of loci specific to multiple myeloma and MGUS/SMM exists.

    “The second group included a list of loci that are specific to multiple myeloma and MGUS/SMM .43-46”

    From Evolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Results section identifies recurrently mutated regulatory regions across cancers but does not identify a list of loci specific to multiple myeloma and MGUS/SMM. A multiple-myeloma study appears in the References; searches for myeloma, MGUS, SMM, and monoclonal gammopathy found no passage making the attributed claim (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • TERT promoter mutations are the most common non-coding mutations in cancer and are found in a growing list of cancers.

    “These mutations are the most common mutations in non-coding sequences in cancer and are found in a long, and almost certainly growing, list of cancers153–158.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weinhold, N., Jacobsen, A., Schultz, N., Sander, C., & Lee, W.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, William
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2014-09-28
Volume
46
Issue
11
Pages
1160-1165
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W1995837988
Cited by
484
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 2
FWCI
19.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U24CA143840, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
regulatory mutations, cancer, mutational hotspots, promoter mutations, SDHD, TERT promoter, melanoma, gene expression, prognosis, cancer genomics
MeSH terms
Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Succinate Dehydrogenase, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Telomerase, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Genomics, Regulatory Elements, Transcriptional, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review