The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Full Freedom: Contemporary Survivors’ Definitions of Slavery
Open accessAbstract
This article examines key debates on the legal definition of slavery from the perspective of survivors. This group has previously not been included in the debates on slavery definitions. By drawing upon new interviews we have conducted with survivors and an analysis of hundreds of historical and contemporary slave narratives, the article resolves this critical oversight. Our analysis maps survivors’ ideas onto existing definitions, and we argue that a survivor-informed definition can expand our understanding of the nature of slavery and, therefore, shape antislavery policies and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Enslaved persons also suffered a complete disregard for age and capacity as regards their wellbeing, a denial of privacy, and a profound lack of futurity (Nicholson 2018; Nicholson et al. 2018).”
From Collapsing the Boundaries Between De Jure and De Facto Slavery: The Foundations of Slavery Beyond the Transatlantic Frame (2020) · cites this paper as Nicholson 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Enslaved persons also suffered a complete disregard for age and capacity as regards their wellbeing, a denial of privacy, and a profound lack of futurity (Nicholson 2018; Nicholson et al. 2018).”
From Collapsing the Boundaries Between De Jure and De Facto Slavery: The Foundations of Slavery Beyond the Transatlantic Frame (2020) · cites this paper as Nicholson et al. 2018
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Historical accounts also describe how persons enslaved in nineteenth century North America were permitted to run small enterprises that enabled the establishment of skills and businesses, which in turn led to economic freedom both during and following enslavement (Nicholson 2018).”
From Collapsing the Boundaries Between De Jure and De Facto Slavery: The Foundations of Slavery Beyond the Transatlantic Frame (2020) · cites this paper as Nicholson 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trautrims, A., Schleper, M. C., Cakir, M. S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1772347 · Cited by 113
How many trafficked people are there in Greater New Orleans? Lessons in measurement
Bales, K., Murphy, L. T., & Silverman, B. W. (2019) · Journal of Human Trafficking · doi:10.1080/23322705.2019.1634936 · Cited by 36
“…of definitions, some of which seem to deny that the phenomenon of trafficking and slavery exists at all, and none of which have drawn upon the knowledge of the lived experience of being trafficked and enslaved available from the many survivors of this crime (Nicholson, Dang, & Trodd, 2018).”
Background‘Still Waiting’ for Justice: Migrant Workers’ Perspectives on Labour Exploitation in Ireland
Murphy, C., Doyle, D. M., & Murphy, M. (2019) · Industrial Law Journal · doi:10.1093/indlaw/dwz023 · Cited by 10
Modern Slavery Responses Need International Business Scholarship
Trautrims, A. (2020) · AIB Insights · doi:10.46697/001c.13539 · Cited by 8
Schwarz, K., & Nicholson, A. (2020) · Human Rights Review · doi:10.1007/s12142-020-00604-y · Cited by 8
“Historical accounts also describe how persons enslaved in nineteenth century North America were permitted to run small enterprises that enabled the establishment of skills and businesses, which in turn led to economic freedom both during and following enslavement (Nicholson 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicholson, A., Dang, M., & Trodd, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nicholson, Andrea
- Venue
- Human Rights Law Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-11-23
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 689-704
- ISSN
- 1461-7781 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-1021
- OpenAlex
- W2900970347
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Rights Law Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P001491/1)
- ransnational Organised Crime, University of Nottingham
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
- Keywords
- slavery, slave narratives, modern slavery, human trafficking, survivor perspectives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
