Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prospective follow-up study of 877 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with ejaculated epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained after ICSI

Bonduelle, M., Wilikens, A., Buysse, A., Van Assche, E., Wisanto, A., Devroey, P., Van Steirteghem, A.C., Liebaers, I.·1996·Human Reproduction

Abstract

A prospective follow-up study of 877 children born after ICSI was carried out. The aim of this study was to compile data on karyotypes, congenital malformations, growth parameters and developmental milestones so as to evaluate the safety of this new technique. The follow-up study included agreement to genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis and was based on a physical examination at the Centre for Medical Genetics (Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University, Brussels, Belgium) at 2 months, 1 year and 2 years, when major and minor malformations and a psychomotor evolution were recorded. Between April 1991 and July 1995, 904 pregnancies obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) led to the birth of 877 children (465 singletons, 379 twins and 33 triplets). Prenatal diagnosis determined a total of 486 karyotypes, of which six were abnormal (1.2%) and six (1.2%) were familial structural aberrations, all transmitted from the father. This slight increase in de-novo chromosomal aberrations and the higher frequency of transmitted chromosomal aberrations are probably linked directly to the characteristics of the infertile men treated rather than to the ICSI procedure itself. In all, 23 (2.6%) major malformations were observed in the children born, defined as those causing functional impairment or requiring surgical correction. No particular malformation was disproportionately frequent. Compared with most registers of children born after assisted reproduction and with registers of malformation in the general population, the figure of 2.6% was within the expected range. These observations should be further completed by others and by collaborative efforts. In the meantime, patiens should be counselled about the available data before any treatment: the risk of transmitted chromosomal aberrations, the risk of de-novo, mainly sex chromosomal, aberrations and the risk of transmitting fertility problems to the offspring. Patients should also be reassured that there seems to be no higher incidence of congenital malformations in children born after ICSI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/11.suppl_4.131

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Bonduelle, M., Wilikens, A., Buysse, A., Van Assche, E., Wisanto, A., Devroey, P., Van Steirteghem, A. C., & Liebaers, I.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
11
Issue
suppl 4
Pages
131-159
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2023711110
Cited by
196
References
0
FWCI
24.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective follow-up study of 877 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with ejaculated epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained after ICSI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/11.suppl_4.131
The paper
Bonduelle, M., Wilikens, A., Buysse, A., Van Assche, E., Wisanto, A., Devroey, P., Van Steirteghem, A. C., & Liebaers, I. (1996). Prospective follow-up study of 877 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with ejaculated epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained after ICSI. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/11.suppl_4.131

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.