The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in- vitro fertilization
Open accessAbstract
The effectiveness of blastocyst culture and transfer in human in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was evaluated in a prospective randomized trial in patients having a moderate to good response to gonadotrophin stimulation. Embryos were transferred either on day 3 after culture to around the 8-cell stage in Ham's F-10 medium supplemented with fetal cord serum, or on day 5 after culture to the blastocyst stage in the sequential serum-free media G 1.2 and G 2.2. The pregnancy rates after transfer on day 3 or day 5 were equivalent, 66 and 71% respectively; however, significantly more embryos were transferred on day 3 (3.7) than on day 5 (2.2). The number of blastocysts transferred did not affect the implantation rate, and pregnancy rates when either two or three blastocysts were transferred were 68 and 87% respectively. The implantation rate of the blastocysts (50.5% fetal heart beat) was significantly higher compared to the cleavage stage embryos transferred on day 3 (30.1%). The percentage of blastocyst development was not affected by the number of 2-pronuclear embryos, or by maternal age. Irrespective of the number of blastocysts formed, pregnancy rates were similar. Furthermore, the pregnancy rate following blastocyst transfer in patients with 10 or more follicles at the time of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration was not affected by patient age. More than 60% of patients having blastocyst culture and transfer had supernumerary embryos for cryopreservation. The establishment of a pregnancy following thaw and transfer confirmed the viability of cryopreserved blastocysts cultured in the absence of serum or co-culture. The ability to transfer just two blastocysts while maintaining high pregnancy rates will therefore help to eliminate high order multiple gestations and improve the overall efficiency of human IVF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer
Gardner, D. K., Lane, M., Stevens, J., Schlenker, T., & Schoolcraft, W. B. (2000) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5 · Cited by 2,091
Self-citationCulture and transfer of human blastocysts
Gardner, D. K., & Schoolcraft, W. B. (1999) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1097/00001703-199906000-00013 · Cited by 895
Self-citationGerris, J., De Neubourg, D., Mangelschots, K., Van Royen, E., Van de Meerssche, M., & Valkenburg, M. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.10.2581 · Cited by 417
Tran, D., Cooke, S., Illingworth, P. J., & Gardner, D. K. (2019) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dez064 · Cited by 312
Self-citationPirtea, P., De Ziegler, D., Tao, X., Sun, L., Zhan, Y., Ayoubi, J. M., Seli, E., Franasiak, J. M., & Scott, R. T. (2021) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.002 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner, D. K., Schoolcraft, W. B., Wagley, L., Schlenker, T., Stevens, J., & Hesla, J.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3434-3440
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2131531401
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in- vitro fertilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
- The paper
- Gardner, D. K., Schoolcraft, W. B., Wagley, L., Schlenker, T., Stevens, J., & Hesla, J. (1998). A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in- vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.