The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer
Abstract
In most in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programmes approximately one ongoing pregnancy in three is multiple. The need to characterize embryos with optimal implantation potential is obvious. We retrospectively examined all of 23 double transfers resulting in ongoing twins, occurring between January 1, 1996 and May 19, 1997. Characteristics of these top quality embryos were absence of multinucleated blastomeres, four or five blastomeres on day 2, seven or more cells on day 3, and </=20% anucleated fragments. In a subsequent series of 400 IVF/ICSI cycles (out of which 372 were selected for embryo transfer) from May 20, 1997 to July 31, 1998, only women <38 years of age had multiple pregnancies: after 221 transfers of two embryos, 45/116 (39%) were multiple, and after 77 transfers of >2 embryos, 11/31 (35%) were multiple. We applied our top quality criteria to the 221 double transfers: 106 transfers with two top embryos resulted in 65 (63%) ongoing pregnancies with 37 (57%) twins, 65 transfers with one top embryo in 38 (58%) ongoing pregnancies with eight (21%) twins. In the group without top embryos, 12/52 (23%) ongoing singletons occurred, with no twins. The corresponding ongoing implantation rates were 49, 35 and 12%. This analysis suggests that single embryo transfer with an acceptable pregnancy rate might be considered if a top quality embryo is available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer
Gardner, D. K., Lane, M., Stevens, J., Schlenker, T., & Schoolcraft, W. B. (2000) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5 · Cited by 2,091
Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries
Ombelet, W., Cooke, I., Dyer, S., Serour, G., & Devroey, P. (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn042 · Cited by 720
Gerris, J., De Neubourg, D., Mangelschots, K., Van Royen, E., Van de Meerssche, M., & Valkenburg, M. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.10.2581 · Cited by 417
Self-citationMorphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos
Fragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Spath, K., & Wells, D. (2014) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gat073 · Cited by 189
Affordable IVF for developing countries
Ombelet, W., & Campo, R. (2007) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60337-9 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Royen, E., Mangelschots, K., De Neubourg, D., Valkenburg, M., Van de Meerssche, M., Ryckaert, G., Eestermans, W., & Gerris, J.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2345-2349
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2163069040
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/14.9.2345
- The paper
- Van Royen, E., Mangelschots, K., De Neubourg, D., Valkenburg, M., Van de Meerssche, M., Ryckaert, G., Eestermans, W., & Gerris, J. (1999). Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.9.2345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.