Cited by 211Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesReproductive Health and Technologies

Sperm morphological defects related to environment, lifestyle and medical history of 1001 male partners of pregnant women from four European cities

Auger, J., Eustache, F., Andersen, A.G., Irvine, D.S., Jørgensen, N., Skakkebæk, N.E., Suominen, J., Toppari, J. +2 more·2001·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Background Recently, differences in semen quality have been found among the partners of pregnant women from four European cities: Turku, Copenhagen, Edinburgh and Paris. Methods During this study, slides from the four centres were subjected to a centralized assessment of sperm morphology. The percentages of sperm defects were recorded using a multiple-entry classification enabling the calculation of the multiple anomalies index (MAI), which is the mean number of anomalies per abnormal sperm. The relationships between various sperm abnormalities and self-reported data on medical history, lifestyle and occupational factors were examined. Results Significant differences in the MAI and most of the sperm defects were found between the four cities, and more abnormalities were found in spring than in winter. An increase in some sperm abnormalities was related to medical treatment of the mother during pregnancy, higher birthweight and previous treatment for cryptorchidism. Significant variations of several sperm defects were related to stress, weekly working time, occupational posture and metal welding, suggesting directions for further exposure studies. Conclusion The present study indicated that the detailed assessment of sperm abnormalities is a useful biomarker of the effect of various external factors which may qualitatively affect human spermatogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2710

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auger, J., Eustache, F., Andersen, A. G., Irvine, D. S., Jørgensen, N., Skakkebæk, N. E., Suominen, J., Toppari, J., Vierula, M., & Jouannet, P.
Affiliations
Hôpital Cochin (FR)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2001-12
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
2710-2717
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W1968960587
Cited by
211
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
sperm morphology, semen quality, environmental factors, lifestyle factors, occupational exposure, metal welding, work posture, working hours, stress, cryptorchidism, birth weight, seasonal variation
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Cryptorchidism, Denmark, Environment, Female, Finland, France, Humans, Life Style, Male, Metallurgy, Middle Aged, Posture, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Scotland, Seasons, Sperm Motility, Sperm Tail, Spermatozoa, Stress, Physiological, Occupational Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review