The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate, using an embryo donation model, whether impaired oocyte/embryo developmental competence and/or changes in uterine milieu are responsible for the previously observed adverse effects of superovulation with gonadotrophins on implantation and fetal development in mice. Embryos from superovulated and non-stimulated females were transferred to separate uterine horns within the same superovulated or non-stimulated pseudopregnant recipient mice. Embryo development was impaired as a significantly higher proportion of normal embryos from control donors (61%) were blastocysts on transfer day compared with superovulated donors (41%; P = 0.001). The implantation rate in control recipients was significantly reduced after transfer of embryos from superovulated donors (12%) compared with control donors (25%; P = 0.001). Uterine receptivity was impaired in superovulated recipients. The implantation rate of control embryos was significantly higher in control (25%) than in superovulated recipients (7%; P = 0.001). Transfer of embryos recovered from superovulated donors resulted in significantly higher post-implantation fetal mortality in superovulated recipients (69%) than in control recipients (36%; P = 0.01), and the mean weight of live fetuses was significantly lower for fetuses obtained from superovulated recipients (0.51 g) compared with that of fetuses obtained from control recipients (0.72 g; P = 0.006). Hence, ovarian stimulation appears to impair oocyte/embryo quality as well as uterine milieu.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation
Zhang, S., Lin, H., Kong, S., Wang, S., Wang, H., Wang, H., & Armant, D. R. (2013) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.011 · Cited by 587
Broer, S. L., Dolleman, M., Opmeer, B. C., Fauser, B. C., Mol, B. W., & Broekmans, F. J. M. (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq034 · Cited by 485
Nelissen, E. C. M., van Montfoort, A. P. A., Dumoulin, J. C. M., & Evers, J. L. H. (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq052 · Cited by 384
The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF
Bourgain, C., & Devroey, P. (2003) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmg045 · Cited by 339
(2019) · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49817-3 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Ertzeid, G.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-225
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2131644540
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/16.2.221
- The paper
- Ertzeid, G. (2001). The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.2.221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.