The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Obstetric outcome in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome
Abstract
Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) often have insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia and may therefore be at an increased risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Hyperinsulinaemia may also be associated with pre-eclampsia. Information concerning outcome of pregnancies in PCOS women is scanty and somewhat controversial. Therefore, 99 pregnancies were retrospectively evaluated in women with PCOS and the findings were compared with an unselected control population. The average body mass index (BMI) in PCOS patients was greater than that in controls (25.6 versus 23.0) (P < 0.0001), and PCOS patients were more often nulliparous than controls (76 versus 42%) (P < 0.001). The multiple pregnancy rate was 9.1% in PCOS patients and 1.1% in controls [odds ratio (OR) 9.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5-23.3]. GDM developed in 20% of the PCOS patients and in 8.9% of the controls (P < 0.001). After logistic regression analysis, BMI >25 seemed to be the greatest predictor for GDM (adjusted OR 5.1; CI 3.2-8.3), while PCOS remained as another independent predictor (adjusted OR 1.9; CI 1.0-3.5). In contrast, PCOS was not a significant predictor for pre-eclampsia, which was merely associated with nulliparity. Premature delivery (16.1% in PCOS and 6.5% in controls) was explained to a large extent by multiple pregnancies and marginally by nulliparity and PCOS. In singleton pregnancies, there was no difference in birth weights, Apgar scores or perinatal morbidity of infants. In conclusion, PCOS slightly increases the risk for GDM, but does not have an important effect on the rate of premature delivery and pre-eclampsia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More than twice the percentage of pregnancies with GDM was observed in women that were previously treated for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) [20].”
From Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—Recent Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Profound Peripheral Insulin Resistance, Independent of Obesity, in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Dunaif, A., Segal, K. R., Futterweit, W., & Dobrjansky, A. (1989) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.38.9.1165 · Cited by 1,967
Polycystic Ovaries in Women With Gestational Diabetes
Anttila, L. (1998) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00133-1 · Cited by 71
Evidence of High Circulating Testosterone in Women with Prior Preeclampsia1
Laivuori, H. M., Kaaja, R., Rutanen, E., Viinikka, L. U., & Ylikorkala, O. (1998) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.83.2.4543 · Cited by 68
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Legro, R. S., Arslanian, S. A., Ehrmann, D. A., Hoeger, K. M., Murad, M. H., Pasquali, R., & Welt, C. K. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2350 · Cited by 1,919
Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis
Goodarzi, M. O., Dumesic, D. A., Chazenbalk, G., & Azziz, R. (2011) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.217 · Cited by 1,488
A Clinical Update on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Sweeting, A., Wong, J., Murphy, H. R., & Ross, G. P. (2022) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnac003 · Cited by 928
Epidemiology of gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with Type 2 diabetes
Ben‐Haroush, A., Yogev, Y., & Hod, M. (2004) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00985.x · Cited by 856
A meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Boomsma, C. M., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Hughes, E. G., Visser, G. H. A., Fauser, B. C. J. M., & Macklon, N. S. (2006) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml036 · Cited by 852
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikola, M.
- Affiliations
- Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Mikola, M.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 226-229
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2143877744
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, pregnancy outcomes, gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, preterm birth, multiple pregnancy, body mass index, nulliparity, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, birth weight, perinatal morbidity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Insulin Resistance, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy, Multiple, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review