Cited by 224Reproductive Biology and FertilityAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Superovulation of female mice delays embryonic and fetal development

Van der Auwera, I.·2001·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Mouse and human embryos, cultured in vitro, undergo a delay in development compared with those grown in vivo. This delay can be caused by suboptimal culture conditions, but possible influences of ovarian stimulation cannot be excluded. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that both in vitro and in vivo, preimplantation embryonic development and postimplantation fetal development are impaired in superovulated female mice when compared with naturally cycling controls. A delay in in-vitro blastocyst hatching and in-vivo blastocyst formation (P < 0.03 and P < 0.0001 respectively) and a 40% fetal growth retardation (P < 0.0001) were observed after superovulation in comparison with naturally cycling controls. After transfer to non-stimulated foster mothers, blastocysts from stimulated females had a lower implantation rate (P < 0.005), and developed into fewer living fetuses (P < 0.02), more resorption sites (P < 0.02) and had more pronounced growth retardation (P < 0.0001) when compared with blastocysts from naturally cycling controls. In conclusion, superovulation in the mouse causes a delayed embryonic development in vitro and in vivo, an increased abnormal blastocyst formation, a pronounced fetal growth retardation, and an increased number of resorption sites. If this observation in mice can be extrapolated to humans, it may offer an explanation for the delay in embryonic development and the low birth weight observed after IVF.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/16.6.1237

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Van der Auwera, I.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
1237-1243
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2099401496
Cited by
224
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
superovulation, ovulation induction, preimplantation embryo development, blastocyst development, blastocyst hatching, fetal growth restriction, implantation rate, embryo resorption, embryo culture, low birth weight, in vitro fertilization, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, Blastocyst, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Fetal Growth Retardation, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Mice, Inbred CBA, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Embryo Implantation, Placebos, Pregnancy, Superovulation, Culture Techniques, Embryonic Development, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review