The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Origins of vaginal acidity: high d/l lactate ratio is consistent with bacteria being the primary source
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The origin of the lactic acid that acidifies the vagina is not well established. It is widely accepted that during times of high oestrogen (during the neonatal period and again during a woman's reproductive years) large amounts of glycogen are deposited in the vaginal epithelium and that the glycogen is anaerobically metabolized to lactic acid. What is not established is whether lactic acid is primarily produced by vaginal bacteria or by vaginal epithelial cells. Human cells can make only L-lactate, while bacteria can produce both D- and L-, thus the D- to L-lactate ratio can indicate the relative contribution of bacterially derived lactic acid. METHODS: In this study, we used chiral HPLC to examine the percentages of D- and L-lactate in vaginal secretions, in primary cultures of bacteria from these vaginal secretions, and in cultures of lactobacillus isolates of vaginal origin. RESULTS: We found that in most vaginal secretion samples, >50% of the lactic acid was the D-isoform (mean 55%, range 6-75%, n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: Our results thus support the hypothesis that vaginal bacteria, not epithelial cells, are the primary source of lactic acid in the vagina.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites
Koh, A., De Vadder, F., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P., & Bäckhed, F. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.041 · Cited by 7,070
Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women
Ravel, J., Gajer, P., Abdo, Z., Schneider, G. M., Koenig, S. S. K., McCulle, S. L., Karlebach, S., Gorle, R., Russell, J., Tacket, C. O., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002611107 · Cited by 4,254
Romero, R., Hassan, S. S., Gajer, P., Tarca, A. L., Fadrosh, D. W., Nikita, L., Galuppi, M., Lamont, R. F., Chaemsaithong, P., Miranda, J., et al. (2014) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-4 · Cited by 852
The Vaginal Microenvironment: The Physiologic Role of Lactobacilli
Amabebe, E., & Anumba, D. O. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00181 · Cited by 785
The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health
Tachedjian, G., Aldunate, M., Bradshaw, C. S., & Cone, R. A. (2017) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.001 · Cited by 557
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boskey, E. R., Cone, R. A., Whaley, K. J., & Moench, T. R.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1809-1813
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2014605450
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Origins of vaginal acidity: high d/l lactate ratio is consistent with bacteria being the primary source. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/16.9.1809
- The paper
- Boskey, E. R., Cone, R. A., Whaley, K. J., & Moench, T. R. (2001). Origins of vaginal acidity: high d/l lactate ratio is consistent with bacteria being the primary source. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.9.1809
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.