The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most analyses of age-related changes in fertility cannot separate effects due to reduced frequency of sexual intercourse from effects directly related to ageing. Information on intercourse collected daily through each menstrual cycle provides the data for estimating day-specific probabilities of pregnancy for specific days relative to ovulation, and these estimates allow unconfounded analysis of ageing effects. METHODS: A total of 782 healthy couples using natural family planning methods contributed prospective data on 5860 menstrual cycles. Day of ovulation was based on basal body temperature measurements. Estimates of day-specific probabilities of pregnancy and the length of the fertile window were compared across age groups. RESULTS: Nearly all pregnancies occurred within a 6 day fertile window. There was no evidence for a shorter fertile window in older men or women. On average, the day-specific probabilities of pregnancy declined with age for women from the late 20s onward, with probabilities of pregnancy twice as high for women aged 19-26 years compared with women aged 35-39 years. Controlling for age of the woman, fertility was significantly reduced for men aged >35 years. CONCLUSIONS: Women's fertility begins to decline in the late 20s with substantial decreases by the late 30s. Fertility for men is less affected by age, but shows significant decline by the late 30s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using the ratio of urinary oestrogen and progesterone metabolites to estimate day of ovulation
Baird, D. D., Weinberg, C. R., Wilcox, A. J., McConnaughey, D. R., & Musey, P. I. (1991) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780100209 · Cited by 160
A FIELD TRIAL OF THE BASAL-BODY-TEMPERATURE METHOD OF REGULATING BIRTHS
Marshall, J. (1968) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92886-9 · Cited by 89
Cited by
Pregnancy leads to long-lasting changes in human brain structure
Hoekzema, E., Barba-Müller, E., Pozzobon, C., Picado, M., Lucco, F., García-García, D., Soliva, J. C., Tobeña, A., Desco, M., Crone, E. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4458 · Cited by 788
Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood
Schmidt, L., Sobotka, T., Bentzen, J. G., Nyboe Andersen, A., & on behalf of the ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr040 · Cited by 656
Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility
Gnoth, C., Godehardt, E., Frank-Herrmann, P., Friol, K., Tigges, J., & Freundl, G. (2005) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh870 · Cited by 603
Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity
Hawkes, K. (2003) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.10156 · Cited by 582
Homan, G. F., Davies, M., & Norman, R. (2007) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml056 · Cited by 546
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunson, D. B.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1399-1403
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2106181357
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1399
- The paper
- Dunson, D. B. (2002). Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.