Cited by 10Reproductive Health and TechnologiesAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Biology and Fertility

Fertility clinics have a duty of care towards patients who do not have children with treatment

Open access
Gameiro, S, Leone, D, Mertes, H·2024·Human Reproduction

Abstract

In medically assisted reproduction (MAR) success has mostly been measured in terms of achieving (healthy) livebirths. We argue this focus is too narrow and that success should be measured in terms of alleviating patient suffering caused by an unfulfilled child wish. The major implication is that clinics must better tailored care to effectively support patients who do not have child(ren) with treatment. First, we argue that clinics have a duty of care towards patients for whom MAR does not result in children because this is a common treatment outcome, because treatment is burdensome and creates new losses for patients, and because the field has the necessary expertise to provide support and it is part of patient-centred care. Then, we examine concerns about the adequacy of addressing the possibility that treatment may end without children, namely, that this may hinder patients' hope and put them off doing treatment, and that it may be perceived as a sign of clinical incompetence, as well as concerns about the required skill set. We end with a set of research-informed recommendations to promote healthy adjustment to ending fertility treatment without children. These focus on the need to reconceptualize 'success' and 'failure' in MAR, to promote open discussion about the possibility of treatment not resulting in children and encourage patients to develop 'plan(s) B', to support patients who end treatment without children, and to create the organizational structures needed to support clinics and healthcare professionals in this endeavour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/deae128

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. Giving bad news: it’s time to stop. In: Macklon N (ed). Assisted Reproduction in the Complicated Patients. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005, 233– 240.
  2. Hammer-Burns LH. Exit counselling. Int Congress Series 2004; 1266: 264– 269.
  3. Snyder CR. Hope theory: rainbows in the mind. Psychol Inq 2002; 13: 249– 275.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gameiro, S., Leone, D., & Mertes, H.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Ospedale San Paolo (IT)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Gameiro, S
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2024-06-18
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
1591-1598
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W4399827476
Cited by
10
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
assisted reproduction, duty of care, patient-centered care, treatment outcome assessment, patient suffering, hope, clinical competence, Plan B
MeSH terms
Fertility Clinics, Female, Humans, Infertility, Pregnancy, Patient-Centered Care, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review