Cited by 380Reproductive Health and TechnologiesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Frederiksen, Yoon, Farver-Vestergaard, Ingeborg, Skovgård, Ninna Grønhøj, Ingerslev, Hans Jakob, Zachariae, Robert·2015·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the evidence on the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for improving pregnancy rates and reducing distress for couples in treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART). Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library between 1978 and April 2014. Study selection: Studies were considered eligible if they evaluated the effect of any psychosocial intervention on clinical pregnancy and/or distress in infertile participants, used a quantitative approach and were published in English. Data extraction: Study characteristics and results were extracted and the methodological quality was assessed. Effect sizes (ES; Hedges g) were pooled using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I 2 , and publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s method. Possible moderators and mediators were explored with meta-analyses of variances (ANOVAs) and meta-regression. Results: We identified 39 eligible studies (total N=2746 men and women) assessing the effects of psychological treatment on pregnancy rates and/or adverse psychological outcomes, including depressive symptoms, anxiety, infertility stress and marital function. Statistically significant and robust overall effects of psychosocial intervention were found for both clinical pregnancy (risk ratio=2.01; CI 1.48 to 2.73; p<0.001) and combined psychological outcomes (Hedges g=0.59; CI 0.38 to 0.80; p=0.001). The pooled ES for psychological outcomes were generally larger for women (g: 0.51 to 0.73) than men (0.13 to 0.34), but the difference only reached statistical significance for depressive symptoms (p=0.004). Meta-regression indicated that larger reductions in anxiety were associated with greater improvement in pregnancy rates (Slope 0.19; p=0.004). No clear-cut differences were found between effects of cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT; g=0.84), mind–body interventions (0.61) and other intervention types (0.50). Conclusions: The present meta-analysis suggests that psychosocial interventions for couples in treatment for infertility, in particular CBT, could be efficacious, both in reducing psychological distress and in improving clinical pregnancy rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006592

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overall effect size of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions on combined psychological outcomes was non-significant, and efficacy did not differ according to intervention type.

    “Furthermore, the overall effect size associated with randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions on combined psychological outcomes was non-significant and efficacy was not found to differ according to intervention type.”

    From Infertility-related distress and clinical targets for psychotherapy: A qualitative study (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

    In Results > Possible moderators (page not specified), the study-design analysis reports a statistically significant effect on psychological outcomes for RCTs (g=0.70), contrary to the claimed non-significant overall RCT effect. The intervention-type analysis does support the other part: differences between intervention types did not reach statistical significance. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness approaches have proven limited efficacy for infertility-related distress.

    “Although mindfulness approaches have proven to be of limited efficacy for infertility-related distress, one mindfulness-based approach that has yet to be applied to infertility is loving-kindness meditation (LKM),41 which seems to map on well to both shame/self-blame and severed relationships with others.”

    From Infertility-related distress and clinical targets for psychotherapy: A qualitative study (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results (Effects of psychosocial intervention; page not provided) report small, statistically non-significant effects on infertility-related distress across psychosocial interventions. The Study characteristics section defines mind–body interventions broadly, including mindfulness alongside yoga and relaxation. The paper therefore supports limited evidence for reducing infertility-related distress overall, but does not establish that mindfulness approaches specifically have proven limited efficacy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CBT has been applied to infertility with limited results.

    “Though CBT has been applied to infertility in a number of studies, with limited results, there are a number of CBT-based techniques that have yet to be used but that may address some of the specific infertility-related psychological challenges raised in this study.”

    From Infertility-related distress and clinical targets for psychotherapy: A qualitative study (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results (Study characteristics; page unavailable) identify eight CBT studies, supporting that CBT has been applied to infertility. The Results (Possible moderators; page unavailable) report a significant effect on psychological outcomes before adjustment for publication bias, but a smaller effect afterward; the adjusted CBT estimate was not statistically significant. Calling the results simply “limited” omits the paper’s conclusion that CBT could be beneficial. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cognitive restructuring, progressive muscle relaxation, and mindfulness meditation are the most-used and tested approaches for infertility-related distress, but their efficacy is limited.

    “While cognitive restructuring, progressive muscle relaxation, and mindfulness meditation are the most-used and tested approaches to date for the treatment of infertility-related distress, their efficacy in this population is limited.15”

    From Infertility-related distress and clinical targets for psychotherapy: A qualitative study (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results (Study characteristics) identify CBT and mind–body interventions as the most frequently studied categories, and the Results (Effects of psychosocial intervention) find small, nonsignificant effects on infertility-related distress. The paper does not establish that the three named techniques are individually the most used or tested, or assess their efficacy separately; its Conclusions describe CBT and mind–body interventions more broadly as beneficial for reducing distress. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychological interventions for infertility result in small reductions in anxiety but do not improve depressive symptoms, infertility distress or marital functioning when adjusting for publication bias.

    “Though they were found to result in small reductions in anxiety, they were not found to improve depressive symptoms, infertility distress or marital functioning when adjusting for publication bias.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [54]Bjornsen K Opening the door to fertility. retreat to fertile ground: sometimes the secret to getting pregnant lies in just getting away from it all. Altern Med 2006 (88): 80– 1. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=c8h&AN=2009216983&site=ehost-live
  2. [97]Galhardo A, Cunha M, Pinto-Gouveia J Developing mindfulness and acceptance skills in infertility: the mindfulness based program for infertility. Aten Primaria 2013; 45: 143.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frederiksen, Y., Farver-Vestergaard, I., Skovgård, N. G., Ingerslev, H. J., & Zachariae, R.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Frederiksen, Yoon
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
e006592
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103859384
Cited by
380
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 6
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Aarhus Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
psychosocial interventions, infertility, assisted reproduction, clinical pregnancy rate, psychological distress, depressive symptoms, anxiety, infertility stress, couples, cognitive behavioral therapy, mind-body interventions
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Pregnancy Rate, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review