The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE
Abstract
European results of assisted reproductive techniques from treatments initiated during 2001 are presented in this fifth report. Data were collected mainly from already existing national registers. From 23 countries, 579 clinics reported 289 690 cycles with: IVF 120 946, ICSI 114 378, frozen embryo transfer (FER) 47 195 and egg donation (ED) 7171. Overall this represents a 4% increase since the year 2000. For the first time, results on European data on intra-uterine inseminations (IUIs) were reported from 15 countries. A total of 67 124 cycles [IUI husband'sperm (IUI-H) 52 949 and IUI donor sperm (IUI-D) 14 185] were included. In 12 countries where all clinics reported to the register, a total of 108 910 cycles were performed in a population of 131.4 million, corresponding to 829 cycles per million inhabitants. For IVF, the clinical pregnancy rate per aspiration and per transfer was 25.1 and 29.0%, respectively. For ICSI, the corresponding rates were 26.2 and 28.3%. These figures are similar to the results from 2000. After IUI-H, the clinical pregnancy rate was 12.8% in women <40 and 9.7% in women > or =40 years of age. After IVF and ICSI, the distribution of transfer of one, two, three and > or =4 embryos was 12.0, 51.7, 30.8 and 5.5%, respectively. Compared with the year 2000, fewer embryos were transferred, but huge differences existed between countries. The distribution of singleton, twin and triplet deliveries for IVF and ICSI combined was 74.5, 24.0 and 1.5%, respectively. This gives a total multiple delivery rate of 25.5%, compared with 26.9% in the year 2000. The range of triplet deliveries after IVF and ICSI differed from 0.0 to 8.2% between countries. After IUI-H in women <40 years of age, 10.2% were twin and 1.1% were triplet gestations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Ferraretti, A. P., Kupka, M. S., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K. G. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dep035 · Cited by 599
Lampic, C., Svanberg, A. S., Karlström, P., & Tydén, T. (2006) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dei367 · Cited by 474
Gaysina, D., Fergusson, D. M., Leve, L. D., Horwood, J., Reiss, D., Shaw, D. S., Elam, K. K., Natsuaki, M. N., Neiderhiser, J. M., & Harold, G. T. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.127 · Cited by 152
Hvidtjørn, D., Schieve, L., Schendel, D., Jacobsson, B., Sværke, C., & Thorsen, P. (2009) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.507 · Cited by 144
Ziebe, S., Devroey, P., & on behalf of the State of the ART 2007 Workshop Group (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn038 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM), F. T. E. S. O. H. R. A. E. (.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1158-1176
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2303855039
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/deh755
- The paper
- The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM), F. T. E. S. O. H. R. A. E. (. (2005). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.