Cited by 77Reproductive Health and TechnologiesAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and Contraception

Assisted reproductive technologies are an integrated part of national strategies addressing demographic and reproductive challenges

Ziebe, S., Devroey, P., on behalf of the State of the ART 2007 Workshop Group·2008·Human Reproduction Update

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The decline in the total fertility rate in the latter half of the 20th century in many European countries is becoming increasingly important in determining the demographic composition of Europe and its individual member states. This review focuses on discussion surrounding how assisted reproductive technology (ART) can impact declining fertility rates. METHODS: This article summarizes key aspects of presentations given at the 'State of the ART 2007-ART and Society' meeting held in Lyon, France, in June 2007. For each topic, searches were conducted in MEDLINE and other databases and the results, alongside unpublished data and personal opinion, were presented to the Workshop Group. Individual subjects were discussed and any disagreements or omissions resolved. RESULTS: Although reduced fertility rates will have an impact on total population number, it is the change in the age structure of the population that is likely to be the most challenging factor faced by the European Union (EU). With evidence suggesting that an ageing population threatens future standards of living and social cohesion, managing demographic change through integrated policy response has become an important component of EU legislation. However, current measures fail to tackle the contribution that ART may play in alleviating falling fertility rates. Indeed, ART can have an important impact on economic and demographic factors, and should be incorporated into a population policy mix. Current barriers to ART include legislative restriction across different EU countries, limited availability to ART and current perception of ART in society. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of ART as part of a population policy mix in Europe is justified but must involve better communication among ART professionals, politicians and the general public.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humupd/dmn038

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The concept of family building has, until recently, been largely ignored in family-planning paradigms.

    “Despite this entirely changed paradigm of population growth, the concept of family building (the process by which individuals or couples create or expand their families) has, until recently, been largely ignored in family-planning paradigms (Ziebe and Devroey, 2008; Seifer et al., 2015; Bakkensen and Goldman, 2022).”

    From Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as Ziebe and Devroey, 2008

    In “Changing demographics in Europe” (page unavailable), the paper says European Commission policy communications failed to address ART’s potential contribution to fertility rates. That supports a narrower claim about overlooking assisted reproduction in demographic policy, but not the broader claim that family building was largely ignored in family-planning paradigms. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [41]41. Pinborg A, Schmidt L, Nyboe Andersen A. Crude 5-year follow-up on delivery and adoption rates among 1338 new couples treated with ART. Hum Reprod 2007;22:i30.
  2. [52]52. United Nations. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development. 1994. http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/offeng/ poa.html (April 2008, date last accessed).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziebe, S., Devroey, P., & on behalf of the State of the ART 2007 Workshop Group
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
Human Reproduction Update
Published
2008-09-29
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
583-592
ISSN
  • 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2369
OpenAlex
W2100264709
Cited by
77
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction Update (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
assisted reproduction, fertility decline, population aging, demographic change, population policy, European Union law, reproductive health policy, access to assisted reproduction, public perception of art, age structure
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Birth Rate, Congresses as Topic, Demography, Europe, Family Planning Services, Female, Humans, Infertility, Longevity, Male, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review