Cited by 289Sperm and Testicular FunctionSmoking Behavior and CessationMale Reproductive Health Studies

Is smoking a risk factor for decreased semen quality? A cross-sectional analysis

Ramlau-Hansen, C.H., Thulstrup, A.M., Aggerholm, A.S., Jensen, M.S., Toft, G., Bonde, J.P.·2007·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Background Previous studies suggest a deleterious effect of cigarette smoking on semen quality, but their results have not been consistent. We studied the association between current smoking and semen characteristics and hormonal levels in a large group of healthy men. Methods From 1987 to 2004, seven separate occupational or environmental semen quality studies were co-ordinated by our department. A total of 2562 men participated, each providing semen and blood sample and answering a questionnaire about lifestyle and factors related to health. Appropriate semen and smoking data were available for 2542 men. Results Adjusting for study, age and other covariates, we observed an inverse dose-response relation between smoking and semen volume, total sperm count and percentage motile sperm. Heavy smokers had a 19% lower sperm concentration than non-smokers. We found a positive dose-response relationship between smoking and testosterone, LH and the LH/free testosterone ratios. Conclusion Current smoking in adult life moderately impairs the semen quality. It is well known that semen quality is associated to fecundity. Therefore, it would be sensible to advise men to abstain from smoking to avoid decreased fecundity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/del364

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Thulstrup, A. M., Aggerholm, A. S., Jensen, M. S., Toft, G., & Bonde, J. P.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2006-09-11
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
188-196
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2148871426
Cited by
289
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
cigarette smoking, semen quality, sperm concentration, semen volume, total sperm count, sperm motility, testosterone, luteinizing hormone, male fertility, dose-response relationship, healthy men
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Oligospermia, Risk Factors, Semen, Smoking, Sperm Count, Odds Ratio, Azoospermia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review