Cited by 38Reproductive Health and TechnologiesEthics and bioethics in healthcareReproductive Health and Contraception

Ethical issues of infertility treatment in developing countries

Open access
Pennings, G.·2008·ESHRE Monographs

Abstract

The provision of infertility treatment in developing countries is controversial. Reports over the last decades have inculcated in people from Western countries the belief that overpopulation is the major problem of developing countries. This paper will analyse the different arguments advanced for and against providing infertility treatment to resource-poor countries. There are two arguments in favour: reproductive autonomy and the huge burden of infertility in these countries. Pronatalism, which reigns in almost all developing countries, is to a great extent responsible for the devastating effects of infertility. The five arguments against the application of infertility treatment are overpopulation, prioritization of limited resources, prevention rather than cure, justice and equal access and risk of abuse. The importance of a person's reproductive autonomy demands that efforts should be made to enable people to determine how many children to have. This is equally true in developing countries. However, given the enormous difficulties of resource-poor countries to provide even the most basic goods, the contribution by society should be directed mostly at prevention and should depend on a strong cost reduction for assisted reproductive technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/den142

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. sandelowsky M, de Lacey s. The uses of a 'disease': infertility as rhetorical vehicle. in: inhorn MC, Van balen F (eds). infertility around the Globe. berkeley, Los angeles, London: University of California press, 2002, 33-51.
  2. shah i. Treatment of infertility: an integral part of reproductive health and a necessity. reprod health Matters 1994;4:96-97.
  3. sundby J. infertility and health care in countries with less resources: case studies from sub-saharan africa. in: inhorn MC, Van balen F (eds). infertility around the Globe. berkeley, Los angeles, London: University of California press, 2002, 247-259.
  4. Toubia nF. social pressure is not the only reason people want children. reprod health Matters 1994;4:94-95.
  5. United nations. programme of action adopted at the interna- tional Conference on population and Development, Cairo, 1994.
  6. Van balen F, inhorn MC. introduction. interpreting infertility: a view from the social sciences. in: inhorn MC, Van balen F (eds). infertility around the globe. berkeley, Los angeles, London: University of California press, 2002, 3-32.
  7. Verweij M. preventing disease. in: ashcroft re, Dawson a, Draper h, McMillan Jr (eds). principles of health Care ethics, 2nd edn. Chichester: John Wiley & sons, 2007, 557- 562.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pennings, G.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Pennings, G.
Venue
ESHRE Monographs
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
2008
Issue
1
Pages
15-20
ISSN
  • 1477-741X (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-8378
OpenAlex
W2112248228
Cited by
38
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • ESHRE Monographs (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
infertility treatment, assisted reproduction, developing countries, reproductive autonomy, pronatalism, overpopulation, resource allocation, infertility prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review