Cited by 347Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences

International disparities in access to infertility services

Open access
Nachtigall, Robert D.·2006·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To characterize the international availability of infertility services.Design A PubMed computer search to identify relevant articles.Setting Academic medical center.Patient(s) None.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) None.Result(s) Epidemiological data suggests that approximately 80 million people worldwide are infertile. Most countries in the industrial west have declining fertility rates marked by late marriage, postponed childbearing, and primary infertility. In contrast, in the developing world, there is little voluntary effort to postpone childbearing and early first marriage is common. However, a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and infections acquired as a result of inadequate health care result in increased rates of secondary infertility. In developing societies, childlessness is often highly stigmatized and leads to profound social suffering for infertile women in particular, yet most infertile people in the developing world have virtually no access to effective treatment. Internationally, a minority of countries offer IVF, and even where it is available, on average it is prohibitively expensive and utilized by a fraction of those who could benefit from its use.Conclusion(s) Wide disparities exist in the quality, availability, and delivery of infertility services between the developed and developing nations of the world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.066

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are almost no data available regarding men's access to fertility care.

    “Finally, there are almost no data available regarding men’s access to fertility care (Nachtigall, 2006; Tarsi and Tuff, 2012; Rogers, 2017; Dyer et al., 2020).”

    From Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as Nachtigall, 2006

    The Cost of Infertility Services section (page not provided) discusses limited access to treatment for infertile men and women, while The Experience of Infertility gives a treatment-seeking figure for women. Neither passage addresses whether data on men’s access are scarce; searches for men’s access data and treatment-seeking information found no such statement. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]1. United Nations. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, Egypt, 5-13 September 1994. New York: United Nations Population Fund, 1995:E.95.XIII.18.
  2. [39]39. Inhorn MC. Babies in global test tubes: gender, science, and reproduc- tive technology in Islamic Egypt. New York: Routledge, 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nachtigall, R. D.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Nachtigall, Robert D.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
85
Issue
4
Pages
871-875
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013411860
Cited by
347
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 25
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Keywords
infertility services, developing countries, in vitro fertilization, infertility stigma, secondary infertility, primary infertility, fertility decline
MeSH terms
Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infertility, Male, Global Health, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review