The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of sperm oxidative stress in male infertility and the significance of oral antioxidant therapy
Abstract
Oxidative stress in the male germ line is thought to affect male fertility and impact upon normal embryonic development. Accordingly, fertility specialists are actively exploring the diagnosis of such stress in spermatozoa and evaluating the possible use of antioxidants to ameliorate this condition. In this review, evidence for the presence of oxidative stress in human spermatozoa, the origins of this phenomenon, its clinical significance in the aetiology of male infertility and recent advances in methods for its diagnosis and treatment are re-examined. Moreover, an extensive review of the results presented in published clinical studies has been conducted to evaluate the overall impact of oral antioxidants on measures of sperm oxidative stress and DNA damage. Administration of antioxidants to infertile men has been assessed in numerous clinical studies with at least 20 reports highlighting its effect on measures of oxidative stress in human spermatozoa. A qualitative but detailed review of the results revealed that 19 of the 20 studies conclusively showed a significant reduction relating to some measure of oxidative stress in these cells. Strong evidence also supports improved motility, particularly in asthenospermic patients. However, of these studies, only 10 reported pregnancy-related outcomes, with 6 reporting positive associations. Adequately powered, placebo-controlled comprehensive clinical trials are now required to establish a clear role for antioxidants in the prevention of oxidative stress in the male germ line, such that the clinical utility of this form of therapy becomes established once and for all.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Halliwell, B., & Whiteman, M. (2004) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705776 · Cited by 2,238
Baker, M. A., & Aitken, R. J. (2005) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-3-67 · Cited by 194
Self-citation
Cited by
Salas-Huetos, A., Bulló, M., & Salas-Salvadó, J. (2017) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmx006 · Cited by 491
Campbell, J. M., Lane, M., Owens, J. A., & Bakos, H. W. (2015) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.07.012 · Cited by 332
Steiner, A. Z., Hansen, K. R., Barnhart, K. T., Cedars, M. I., Legro, R. S., Diamond, M. P., Krawetz, S. A., Usadi, R., Baker, V. L., Coward, R. M., et al. (2020) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.008 · Cited by 213
“Oxidative stress may also damage the nuclear and mitochondrial genome by causing single and double DNA breaks, chemical modifications of bases, DNA crosslinks, and DNA protein crosslinks (5).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Gharagozloo, P., & Aitken, R. J.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-05-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1628-1640
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2131093877
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.