The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group
Abstract
STUDY QUESTIONS: What are the risks of adverse outcomes in singletons born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Singletons born after FET have a better perinatal outcome compared with singletons born after fresh IVF and ICSI as regards low birthweight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB), but a worse perinatal outcome compared with singletons born after spontaneous conception. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous studies have shown a worse perinatal outcome in children born after IVF in general compared with children born after spontaneous conception. In singletons born after FET, a lower rate of PTB and LBW and a higher rate of large for gestational age (LGA) compared with singletons born after fresh IVF have been shown. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective Nordic population-based cohort study of all singletons conceived after FET in Denmark, Norway and Sweden until December 2007 was performed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: Singletons born after FET (n = 6647) were compared with a control group of singletons born after fresh IVF and ICSI (n = 42 242) and singletons born after spontaneous conception (n = 288 542). Data on perinatal outcomes were obtained by linkage to the national Medical Birth Registries. Odds ratios were calculated for several perinatal outcomes and adjustments were made for maternal age, parity, year of birth, offspring sex and country of origin. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Singletons born after FET had a lower risk of LBW (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.91), PTB (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.92), very PTB (VPTB; aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95) and small for gestational age (SGA; aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.83), but a higher risk of post-term birth (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27-1.55), LGA (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.27-1.64), macrosomia (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.39-1.80) and perinatal mortality (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.07-2.07) compared with singletons born after fresh IVF and ICSI. Compared with children conceived after spontaneous conception, singletons born after FET had a higher risk of LBW (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.13-1.43), very LBW (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.33-2.15), PTB (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.35-1.63), VPTB (aOR 2.68, 95% CI 2.24-3.22), SGA (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.35), LGA (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.15-1.45), macrosomia (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.15-1.45) and perinatal (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.87) neonatal (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.23-2.84) and infant mortality (aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.36-2.72). When analyzing trends over time, the risk of being born LGA increased over time for singletons born after FET compared with singletons born after fresh IVF and ICSI (P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: As in all observational studies, the possible role of residual confounding factors and bias should be considered. In this study, we were not able to control for confounding factors, such as BMI, smoking and reason for, or length of, infertility. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Perinatal outcomes in this large population-based cohort of children born after FET from three Nordic countries compared with fresh IVF and ICSI and spontaneous conception were in agreement with the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fetal Macrosomia: Etiologic Factors
LANGER, O. (2000) · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00003081-200006000-00006 · Cited by 171
Cited by
Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Chen, Z.-J., Shi, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, B., Liang, X., Cao, Y., Yang, J., Liu, J., Wei, D., Weng, N., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1513873 · Cited by 786
Qin, J., Liu, X., Sheng, X., Wang, H., & Gao, S. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007 · Cited by 518
Maheshwari, A., Pandey, S., Amalraj Raja, E., Shetty, A., Hamilton, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2018) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmx031 · Cited by 527
Neonatal and maternal outcome after frozen embryo transfer: Increased risks in programmed cycles
Ginström Ernstad, E., Wennerholm, U.-B., Khatibi, A., Petzold, M., & Bergh, C. (2019) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.010 · Cited by 330
Self-citationSaito, K., Kuwahara, A., Ishikawa, T., Morisaki, N., Miyado, M., Miyado, K., Fukami, M., Miyasaka, N., Ishihara, O., Irahara, M., et al. (2019) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dez079 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Wennerholm, U.-B., Henningsen, A.-K. A., Romundstad, L. B., Bergh, C., Pinborg, A., Skjaerven, R., Forman, J., Gissler, M., Nygren, K. G., & Tiitinen, A.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2545-2553
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2147038326
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/det272
- The paper
- Wennerholm, U.-B., Henningsen, A.-K. A., Romundstad, L. B., Bergh, C., Pinborg, A., Skjaerven, R., Forman, J., Gissler, M., Nygren, K. G., & Tiitinen, A. (2013). Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.