Time to conception and time to live birth in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: What is the time to conception in a cohort of women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage (RM). SUMMARY ANSWER: Median time to conception in women diagnosed with unexplained RM was 21 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 8-55 weeks), with a cumulative incidence of conception of 74% after 12 months of trying to conceive. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: There is no effective treatment in couples with unexplained RM. Adequate counselling about their prognosis, for example time to conception and time to a live birth, is therefore very important. So far, there are no studies that give insight on these issues. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A nested prospective cohort study was performed from February 2004 through July 2009 within a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial (ALIFE trial) on anticoagulant treatment in 364 women with unexplained RM. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 251 women who were not pregnant at the time of diagnosis of unexplained RM were included in this study. Of these, 13% became pregnant with ART, and all other women conceived naturally. The primary outcome was time to conception in weeks, calculated from the moment of diagnosis until conception measured by a urinary HCG. Secondary outcome was time to a live birth in the subsequent pregnancy. The relative prognostic significance of female age, the number of preceding miscarriages, interventions within the trial and the presence or absence of a preceding late miscarriage, a previous live birth and factor V Leiden mutation, was evaluated by Cox regression for time to conception and by competing risk modelling for time to live birth, respectively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The cumulative incidence of conception was 56% after 6 months, 74% after 12 months and 86% after 24 months of which 65% resulted in a live birth. The median time to conception was 21 weeks (IQR 8-55 weeks). Of potential prognostic factors, the presence of the factor V Leiden mutation resulted in a significantly shorter median time to conception of 11 weeks for carriers versus 23 weeks for non-carriers (hazard ratio (HR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-3.65). The cumulative incidence of a live birth of the subsequent pregnancy was 0% after 6 months, 23% after 12 months and 50% after 24 months. The median time to a live birth of the subsequent pregnancy was 102 weeks (IQR 82-115 weeks). The number of previous miscarriages was the only prognostic factor (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.94) significantly associated with time to a live birth of the subsequent pregnancy. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: In our study only the subsequent pregnancy after diagnosing unexplained RM was included. A future collection of cumulative follow-up data of all the women included in this cohort may provide outcomes of all pregnancies following the diagnosis of unexplained RM. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Time to conception in women diagnosed with unexplained RM appears to be comparable with time to conception in healthy fertile women, as reported in the literature. The interesting finding that women with Factor V Leiden mutation have a significant shorter time to conception may suggest a favourable embryo implantation process. Future research is needed to confirm these findings and unravel the biology of early implantation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The RCT used for this nested cohort study was funded by a grant (945-27-003) from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and a grant from GlaxoSmithKline. Study drugs (aspirin and placebo) were packaged and donated by Meda Pharma. This analysis was supported by a VIDI innovative research grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) 016.126.364. There are no potential conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This cohort study was nested in the randomized controlled trial; ALIFE study (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN 58496168).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Based on limited cohort studies, the incidence of miscarriage appears to be increasing in the USA, China and Sweden, but decreasing in Finland.
“Based on limited cohort studies, the incidence of miscarriage appears to be increasing in the USA, 30 China 34 and Sweden 35 , but decreasing in Finland. 28”
From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
Citation 28 is attached to the claim that miscarriage incidence is decreasing in Finland. The Study population and Discussion and Conclusion passages concern time to conception and live birth among women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, not national trends in miscarriage incidence. Searches for Finland, decreasing incidence, and country-specific trends found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi‐state models
Putter, H., Fiocco, M. F., & Geskus, R. B. (2006) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2712 · Cited by 2,458 · see citing works
Rai, R., & Regan, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69204-0 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage
Regan, L., & Rai, R. (2000) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1053/beog.2000.0123 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Gnoth, C. (2003) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deg366 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Aspirin plus Heparin or Aspirin Alone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage
Kaandorp, S. P., Goddijn, M., van der Post, J., Hutten, B. A., Verhoeve, H. R., Hamulyák, K., Mol, B. W., Folkeringa, N., Nahuis, M. J., Papatsonis, D. N. M., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1000641 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Self-citationInfluence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion.
Regan, L., Braude, P., & Trembath, P. L. (1989) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.299.6698.541 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage
Brigham, S. A., Conlon, C., & Farquharson, R. G. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.11.2868 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Aspirin Plus Heparin or Aspirin Alone in Women With Recurrent Miscarriage
Kaandorp, S. P., Goddijn, M., van der Post, J., Hutten, B. A., Verhoeve, H. R., Hamulyák, K., Mol, B. W., Folkeringa, N., Nahuis, M. J., Papatsonis, D. N. M., et al. (2010) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/ogx.0b013e3182021f71 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Self-citationMartinussen, R., & Tannock, R. (2006) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390500205700 · Cited by 270 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The probability of a live birth of the subsequent pregnancy was estimated using a competing risks analysis (Martinussen et al., 2006; Putter et al., 2007).”
MethodDepressive symptoms in women in the six months after miscarriage
Neugebauer, R., Kline, J., O’Connor, P., Shrout, P., Johnson, J., Skodol, A., Wicks, J., & Susser, M. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(92)91839-3 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Brysland, S. A. ;. M. (2014) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1160/th · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Svensson, P., Dahlbäck, B., Maršál, K., et al. (1998) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1614222 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
A three‐month follow‐up of psychological morbidity after early miscarriage
Ptettyman, R. J., Cordle, C. J., & Cook, G. D. (1993) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1993.tb01762.x · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Kaandorp, S. P., Nisio, M. D., Goddijn, M., & Middeldorp, S. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004734.pub3 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationRecurrent miscarriage: Psychological and relational consequences for couples
Serrano, F., & Lima, M. L. (2006) · Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice · doi:10.1348/147608306x96992 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Selection pressure for the factor-V-Leiden mutation and embryo implantation
Göpel, W., Ludwig, M. Z., Junge, A. K., et al. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06354-1 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Genetic aspects of female reproduction
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn009 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Psychological outcomes following missed abortions and provision of follow‐up care
Nikcevic, A. V., Tunkel, S. A., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1998) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11020123.x · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Carriership of Factor V Leiden and Evolutionary Selection Advantage
Lindqvist, P. G., & Dahlbäck, B. (2008) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986708784638852 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Zöller, B., Dahlbäck, B., & Lindqvist, P. G. (2001) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1616547 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Long-term reproductive outcome subsequent to medical versus surgical treatment for miscarriage
Tam, W. H., Tsui, M. H. Y., Lok, I. H., et al. (2005) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dei257 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Factor V Leiden mutation in relation to fecundity and miscarriage in women with venous thrombosis
van Dunné, F. M., Doggen, C. J. M., Heemskerk, M. B. A., et al. (2004) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh640 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Is previous aberrant reproductive outcome predictive of subsequently reduced fecundity?
Hassan, M. A., & Killick, S. R. (2004) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh670 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Time-to-pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes in a South African population
Bello, B., Kielkowski, D., Heederik, D. J. J., et al. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-565 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
van Dunné, F. M., de Craen, A. J. M., Heijmans, B. T., et al. (2006) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dei422 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Increased sperm count may account for high population frequency of factor V Leiden
Cohn, D. M., Repping, S., Buller, H. R., Meijers, J. C. M., & Middeldorp, S. (2009) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03710.x · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quenby, S., Gallos, I. D., Dhillon-Smith, R. K., Podesek, M., Stephenson, M. D., Fisher, J., Brosens, J. J., Brewin, J., Ramhorst, R., Lucas, E. S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00682-6 · Cited by 1,560 · see citing works
Fertility after recurrent miscarriages: results of an observational cohort study
Kling, C., Hedderich, J., & Kabelitz, D. (2018) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4532-4 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaandorp, S. P., van Mens, T. E., Middeldorp, S., Hutten, B. A., Hof, M. H. P., van der Post, J. A. M., van der Veen, F., & Goddijn, M.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kaandorp, S. P.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-03-28
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1146-1152
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2069581164
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- GlaxoSmithKline
- ZonMw (016.126.364)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.126.364)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion, time to conception, time to live birth, factor V Leiden, spontaneous conception, assisted reproduction, anticoagulation, prognostic factors, maternal age, late miscarriage, pregnancy counseling, thrombophilia
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Habitual, Adult, Female, Fertilization, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Pregnancy, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Live Birth, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review