Cited by 69Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumReproductive Health and Contraception

Psychological outcomes following missed abortions and provision of follow‐up care

Nikcevic, A. V., Tunkel, S. A., Nicolaides, K. H.·1998·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

This cross‐sectional study of 204 women who had experienced a missed abortion, diagnosed at 10–14 weeks of pregnancy, examined the availability and desirability of routine follow‐up care, and whether such care is associated with reduced psychological morbidity in the aftermath of miscarriage. Clinically elevated anxiety and depression were observed in 45% and 15% of women, respectively, and the mean score of grief was 2.52 which is similar to that observed in people who suffer death of a close relative. A follow‐up appointment after the miscarriage was thought to have been desirable by 92% of women but was offered to only 30%. No significant association between such care and reduced psychological morbidity was identified. However, there were significantly more women with clinically elevated levels of anxiety among those who felt that they were not provided with an opportunity to discuss their feelings during the follow‐up, suggesting that such a follow‐up either had a deleterious effect on women's psychological state or the distress itself led to such a perception of care. One‐third of women in our sample would have liked psychological counselling to help them deal with the emotional aspects of their loss. Copyright © 1998 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11020123.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a small number of women who have experienced miscarriage receive routine follow-up psychological support.

    “Although it is widely recognized that perinatal loss can lead to psychiatric disorders and CG, only a small number of the women who have experienced miscarriage receive routine follow-up psychological support.54”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikcevic, A. V., Tunkel, S. A., & Nicolaides, K. H.
Affiliations
Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine (GB)
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-02
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
123-128
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2087601082
Cited by
69
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
missed abortion, miscarriage, psychological morbidity, anxiety, depression, grief, follow-up care, psychological counselling, emotional support, early pregnancy loss
MeSH terms
Abortion, Missed, Adult, Anxiety, Continuity of Patient Care, Counseling, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Grief, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review