The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI
Abstract
The health economics of IVF and ICSI involve assessments of utilization, cost, cost-effectiveness and ability to pay. In 48 countries, utilization averaged 289 IVF/ICSI cycles per million of population per annum, ranging from two in Kazachstan, to 1657 in Israel. Higher national utilization of IVF/ICSI was associated with higher quality of health services, as indicated by lower infant mortality rates. IVF and ICSI are scientifically demanding and personnel-intensive, and are therefore expensive procedures. The average cost per IVF/ICSI cycle in 2002 would be US$9547 in the USA, and US$3518 in 25 other countries. Price elasticity estimates suggest that a 10% decrease in IVF/ICSI cost would generate a 30% increase in utilization. The average cost-effectiveness ratios in 2002 would be US$58,394 per live birth in the USA, and US$22,048 in other countries. In three randomized controlled trials, incremental costs per additional live birth with IVF compared with conventional therapy were US$ -26,586, $79,472 and $47,749. The national costs of IVF/ICSI treatment would be US$1.00 per capita in one current model, but the costs to individual couples range from 10% of annual household expenditures in European countries to 25% in Canada and the USA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social determinants of human reproduction
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2001) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/16.7.1518 · Cited by 160
Cited by
Inhorn, M. C., & Patrizio, P. (2015) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv016 · Cited by 1,926
The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries
Chambers, G. M., Sullivan, E. A., Ishihara, O., Chapman, M. G., & Adamson, G. D. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029 · Cited by 438
International disparities in access to infertility services
Nachtigall, R. D. (2006) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.066 · Cited by 347
Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care
Jain, T. (2006) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1338 · Cited by 304
Albuz, F. K., Sasseville, M., Lane, M., Armstrong, D. T., Thompson, J. G., & Gilchrist, R. B. (2010) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deq246 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, J. A.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-277
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2117001305
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/8.3.265
- The paper
- Collins, J. A. (2002). An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/8.3.265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.