The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Culture and symptom reporting at menopause
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of the present paper is to review recent research on the relationship of culture and menopausal symptoms and propose a biocultural framework that makes use of both biological and cultural parameters in future research. Medline was searched for English-language articles published from 2000 to 2004 using the keyword 'menopause' in the journals--Menopause, Maturitas, Climacteric, Social Science and Medicine, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, Journal of Women's Health, Journal of the American Medical Association, American Journal of Epidemiology, Lancet and British Medical Journal, excluding articles concerning small clinical samples, surgical menopause or HRT. Additionally, references of retrieved articles and reviews were hand-searched. Although a large number of studies and publications exist, methodological differences limit attempts at comparison or systematic review. We outline a theoretical framework in which relevant biological and cultural variables can be operationalized and measured, making it possible for rigorous comparisons in the future. Several studies carried out in Japan, North America and Australia, using similar methodology but different culture/ethnic groups, indicate that differences in symptom reporting are real and highlight the importance of biocultural research. We suggest that both biological variation and cultural differences contribute to the menopausal transition, and that more rigorous data collection is required to elucidate how biology and culture interact in female ageing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 · Cited by 15,889
Hulley, S. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.7.605 · Cited by 6,216
Estrogen plus Progestin and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
Manson, J. E., Hsia, J., Johnson, K. C., Rossouw, J. E., Assaf, A. R., Lasser, N. L., Trevisan, M., Black, H. R., Heckbert, S. R., Detrano, R., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030808 · Cited by 2,065
Gold, E. B. (2000) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/152.5.463 · Cited by 861
Hot Flashes: Epidemiology and Physiology a
KRONENBERG, F. (1990) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb30316.x · Cited by 601
Freedman, R. R. (2001) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.1077 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Nelson, H. D. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60346-3 · Cited by 729
The impact of attitudes towards the menopause on women's symptom experience: A systematic review
Ayers, B., Forshaw, M., & Hunter, M. S. (2010) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.10.016 · Cited by 368
Epigenetics: Embedded bodies and the molecularisation of biography and milieu
Niewöhner, J. (2011) · BioSocieties · doi:10.1057/biosoc.2011.4 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Melby, M. K., Lock, M., & Kaufert, P.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-26
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 495-512
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2168585607
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture and symptom reporting at menopause. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dmi018
- The paper
- Melby, M. K., Lock, M., & Kaufert, P. (2005). Culture and symptom reporting at menopause. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.