The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation has been extensively used in assisted reproductive technology, agriculture and conservation programmes for endangered species. The literature reports largely positive results regarding the survival of frozen-thawed cells and clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, it is unclear whether or not cryopreservation of sperm, oocytes and embryos causes any disruption in their genetic integrity. Drawing on the available published evidence, this review paper describes in detail the physical and biochemical factors of cryopreservation that could potentially affect genomic integrity. METHODS: A critical review of the published literature using PubMed with particular emphasis on studies which include assessment of genetic stability after cryopreservation of oocyte, sperm and embryos. The search was performed in 2014 and covered the period from the beginning of electronic records until July 2014. No language restrictions were applied. RESULTS: Cryopreservation is associated with extensive damage to cell membranes, and results in alteration of the functional and metabolic status of the cells and mitochondria. Some evidence suggests an increase in DNA single-strand breaks, and degree of DNA condensation or fragmentation in sperm after cryopreservation. The extent of these changes may vary between different individuals and different techniques. The addition of antioxidants to the cryopreservation media and the use of well-controlled cooling regimes could potentially improve such outcomes. Limited numbers of studies on oocytes provide controversial results regarding the effect on DNA fragmentation, sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and aneuploidy. The only study on human embryos suggested that vitrification affects DNA integrity to a much lesser extent than slow freezing. Animal studies show increases in mitochondrial DNA mutations in embryos after cryopreservation. The limited numbers of long-term follow-up studies in humans provide reassurance that derives mostly from retrospective studies with some methodological weaknesses. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an overview of studies performed to date on the effect of cryopreservation on the oocyte, sperm and embryos. Controversy of the reported data has highlighted the gaps in our knowledge not only for clinical studies, but also for basic research in human embryos. New perspectives for future research are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., Siede, W., Wood, R. D., Schultz, R. A., & Ellenberger, T. (2005) · doi:10.1128/9781555816704 · Cited by 5,683
Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA
Lindahl, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362709a0 · Cited by 5,679
Bootsma, D., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (1996) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(96)81408-9 · Cited by 2,282
Yakes, F. M., & Van Houten, B. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.2.514 · Cited by 1,854
Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at −196 °C by vitrification
Rall, W. F., & Fahy, G. M. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/313573a0 · Cited by 1,645
Mazur, P. (1963) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.47.2.347 · Cited by 1,109
Privalov, P. L. (1990) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239009090612 · Cited by 1,071
PREGNANCY AFTER HUMAN OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION
Chen, C. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90989-x · Cited by 1,007
The protamine family of sperm nuclear proteins
Balhorn, R. (2007) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-227 · Cited by 773
Mechanisms of free radical-induced damage to DNA
Dizdaroglu, M., & Jaruga, P. (2012) · Free Radical Research · doi:10.3109/10715762.2011.653969 · Cited by 738
Cited by
Elliott, G. D., Wang, S., & Fuller, B. J. (2017) · Cryobiology · doi:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.04.004 · Cited by 534
Metadata
- Authors
- Kopeika, J., Thornhill, A., & Khalaf, Y.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-12-17
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-227
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2127087382
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 127
- FWCI
- 15.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dmu063
- The paper
- Kopeika, J., Thornhill, A., & Khalaf, Y. (2015). The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.