Cited by 10Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Understanding the role of incentive salience in sexual decision-making

Open access
Lynch, Kathleen S, Ryan, Michael J·2020·Integrative and Comparative Biology

Abstract

Synopsis: In the search for understanding female sexual decision-making, progress has been made in uncovering a variety of perceptual biases and most of these concern the animal’s sensory biology and cognitive processes. We are now poised to dig deeper into the female’s decision-making and ask if incentive salience, which plays a role in all types of appetitive behaviors, also influences a female’s “taste for the beautiful.” The incentive salience hypothesis suggests that dopamine assigns value or salience to objects or actions. After value is assigned to all potential actions, an action selection system then chooses among potential options to select the most valuable action. In this view, dopamine stimulates reward-seeking behavior by assigning incentive salience to specific behavioral actions, which in turn, increases pursuit and focus on objects or stimuli that represent the valuable action. Here, we apply this framework to understand why females are compelled to respond maximally to some male courtship signals over others and how this process may reveal a female’s hidden mate preferences. We examine studies of dopamine and the mesolimbic reward system because these may play a role in expanding the female’s perceptual landscape for novelty in male courtship signals and establishing novel hidden preferences. We review three avenues of research that may identify signatures of incentive salience in females during sexual decision-making. This review includes studies of dopamine agonist or antagonist administration in females during mate choice or partner preference tests, measures of neural activity in dopaminergic neural circuits during mate choice or partner preference tests, and social regulation of dopamine in females when entering reproductive contexts and/or exposure to mate signals. By applying the incentive salience hypothesis to female reproductive decision-making, it redefines how we see the female’s role in sexual encounters. Females cannot be considered passive during reproductive encounters; rather they are seeking sexual encounters, particularly with males that tap into their perceptual biases and initiate a reward-seeking response. Incentive salience applied to reproductive behavior requires considering females as viewing sexual stimuli as rewarding and initiating action to seek out this reward, all of which indicates females are driving sexual encounters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/icb/icaa054

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence suggests that repeated excitation by sexual stimuli can have a similar sensitization effect.

    “Evidence suggests that repeated excitation by sexual stimuli can have a similar effect (Lynch and Ryan, 2020;Mahler and Berridge, 2012).”

    From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Lynch and Ryan, 2020

    The section 'Looking for evidence of incentive salience in reproductive decisions' reports increased dopamine after exposure to sexual signals and suggests that responses to those signals can be reward-motivated. It does not establish that repeated excitation by sexual stimuli produces a sensitization effect; the References list names a study of sensitized dopamine responses, but the paper does not discuss that finding in the passages retrieved. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 72:283-327.
  2. Paredes RG, A ˚gmo A. 2004. Has dopamine a physiological role in the control of sexual behavior? A critical review of the evidence. Prog Neurobiol 73:179-225.
  3. Richards E. 2017. Darwin and the making of sexual selection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Rosenthal GG. 2017. Mate choice: the evolution of sexual decision making from microbes to humans. Princeton, New Jersey (NJ): Princeton University Press.
  5. Ryan MJ. 2018. A taste for the beautiful: the evolution of attraction. Princeton, New Jersey (NJ): Princeton University Press.
  6. Ryan MJ. Forthcoming 2020. Resolving the problem of sexual beauty. In: DeSilva JM, editor. A most interesting problem, human evolution 150 years after Darwin's the descent of man. Princeton, New Jersey (NJ): Princeton University Press. p. 204-28.
  7. Adan, RAH, Walter HK, editors. Behavioral neurobiology of eating disorders. Berlin (Germany): Springer. p. 81-93.
  8. Zahavi A, Zahavi A. 1997. The handicap principle, a missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lynch, K. S., & Ryan, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Hofstra University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Lynch, Kathleen S
Venue
Integrative and Comparative Biology
Published
2020-07-06
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
712-721
ISSN
  • 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7023
OpenAlex
W3031448850
Cited by
10
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Integrative and Comparative Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
incentive salience, mate choice, female reproductive behavior, dopamine, mesolimbic reward system, reward-seeking behavior, mate preferences
MeSH terms
Animals, Decision Making, Dopamine, Limbic System, Motivation, Reward, Sexual Behavior, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review