Understanding the role of incentive salience in sexual decision-making
Open accessAbstract
Synopsis: In the search for understanding female sexual decision-making, progress has been made in uncovering a variety of perceptual biases and most of these concern the animal’s sensory biology and cognitive processes. We are now poised to dig deeper into the female’s decision-making and ask if incentive salience, which plays a role in all types of appetitive behaviors, also influences a female’s “taste for the beautiful.” The incentive salience hypothesis suggests that dopamine assigns value or salience to objects or actions. After value is assigned to all potential actions, an action selection system then chooses among potential options to select the most valuable action. In this view, dopamine stimulates reward-seeking behavior by assigning incentive salience to specific behavioral actions, which in turn, increases pursuit and focus on objects or stimuli that represent the valuable action. Here, we apply this framework to understand why females are compelled to respond maximally to some male courtship signals over others and how this process may reveal a female’s hidden mate preferences. We examine studies of dopamine and the mesolimbic reward system because these may play a role in expanding the female’s perceptual landscape for novelty in male courtship signals and establishing novel hidden preferences. We review three avenues of research that may identify signatures of incentive salience in females during sexual decision-making. This review includes studies of dopamine agonist or antagonist administration in females during mate choice or partner preference tests, measures of neural activity in dopaminergic neural circuits during mate choice or partner preference tests, and social regulation of dopamine in females when entering reproductive contexts and/or exposure to mate signals. By applying the incentive salience hypothesis to female reproductive decision-making, it redefines how we see the female’s role in sexual encounters. Females cannot be considered passive during reproductive encounters; rather they are seeking sexual encounters, particularly with males that tap into their perceptual biases and initiate a reward-seeking response. Incentive salience applied to reproductive behavior requires considering females as viewing sexual stimuli as rewarding and initiating action to seek out this reward, all of which indicates females are driving sexual encounters.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence suggests that repeated excitation by sexual stimuli can have a similar sensitization effect.
“Evidence suggests that repeated excitation by sexual stimuli can have a similar effect (Lynch and Ryan, 2020;Mahler and Berridge, 2012).”
From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Lynch and Ryan, 2020
The section 'Looking for evidence of incentive salience in reproductive decisions' reports increased dopamine after exposure to sexual signals and suggests that responses to those signals can be reward-motivated. It does not establish that repeated excitation by sexual stimuli produces a sensitization effect; the References list names a study of sensitized dopamine responses, but the paper does not discuss that finding in the passages retrieved. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127 · see citing works
Romantic love: an fMRI study of a neural mechanism for mate choice.
Fisher, H., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2005) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20772 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Perceptual Biases and Mate Choice
Ryan, M. J., & Cummings, M. E. (2013) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135901 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationDopamine modulates novelty seeking behavior during decision making.
Costa, V. D., Tran, V. L., Turchi, J., & Averbeck, B. B. (2014) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/a0037128 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
The role of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and striatum during sexual behavior in the female rat
Becker, J. B., Rudick, C. N., & Jenkins, W. J. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-09-03236.2001 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Estrogenic regulation of dopaminergic neurons in the opportunistically breeding zebra finch
Kabelik, D., Schrock, S. E., Ayres, L. C., & Goodson, J. L. (2011) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.04.026 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Jennions MD, Petrie M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 72:283-327.
- Paredes RG, A ˚gmo A. 2004. Has dopamine a physiological role in the control of sexual behavior? A critical review of the evidence. Prog Neurobiol 73:179-225.
- Richards E. 2017. Darwin and the making of sexual selection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Rosenthal GG. 2017. Mate choice: the evolution of sexual decision making from microbes to humans. Princeton, New Jersey (NJ): Princeton University Press.
- Ryan MJ. 2018. A taste for the beautiful: the evolution of attraction. Princeton, New Jersey (NJ): Princeton University Press.
- Ryan MJ. Forthcoming 2020. Resolving the problem of sexual beauty. In: DeSilva JM, editor. A most interesting problem, human evolution 150 years after Darwin's the descent of man. Princeton, New Jersey (NJ): Princeton University Press. p. 204-28.
- Adan, RAH, Walter HK, editors. Behavioral neurobiology of eating disorders. Berlin (Germany): Springer. p. 81-93.
- Zahavi A, Zahavi A. 1997. The handicap principle, a missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept
Toates, F. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104872 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Evidence suggests that repeated excitation by sexual stimuli can have a similar effect (Lynch and Ryan, 2020; Mahler and Berridge, 2012).”
Background
- Authors
- Lynch, K. S., & Ryan, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Hofstra University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lynch, Kathleen S
- Venue
- Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-07-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 712-721
- ISSN
- 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7023
- OpenAlex
- W3031448850
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Integrative and Comparative Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- incentive salience, mate choice, female reproductive behavior, dopamine, mesolimbic reward system, reward-seeking behavior, mate preferences
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Decision Making, Dopamine, Limbic System, Motivation, Reward, Sexual Behavior, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review